Arousal State Determination for Objective Mental Care Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mental care services rely on subjective judgments and lack an objective mental state index, making it difficult to provide appropriate feedback and maintain long-term motivation, as they insufficiently determine the complex mental state of humans.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that determines a user's arousal state among hyperarousal, optimal arousal, and hypoarousal using physiological, subjective, and behavioral indices, and generates feedback based on the Polyvagal theory to guide the arousal state towards optimal levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If subjective judgment is used for mental care services, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision of mental state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual system of subjective judgment with an automated information processing system that objectively measures mental state using physiological indices. The arousal state determination unit automatically calculates arousal state based on measured data, substituting human subjective assessment with objective computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If only simple arousal state measurement is used, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision of complex mental state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex mental state measurement into distinct components: physiological index measurement (respiration rate, heart rate), subjective index collection (self-assessment questionnaires), and behavioral index observation. Each component is measured and processed separately, then integrated to determine the overall arousal state, making the complex measurement manageable and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses multiple physiological parameters (respiration rate, heart rate variability) and transforms them into meaningful indicators of arousal state. By changing and combining multiple parameters rather than relying on a single measure, the system achieves precise measurement of complex mental state while maintaining reasonable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If objective mental state index is introduced, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The information processing apparatus is designed to perform multiple functions: measuring physiological indices, collecting subjective indices, observing behavioral indices, calculating arousal state, and providing feedback. This multi-functional device consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated platform, achieving precise objective measurement while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-service elements where users independently complete self-assessment questionnaires and the system automatically processes all data without requiring external expert intervention. This reduces the need for complex manual assessment procedures and specialized equipment, achieving objective measurement with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If feedback is provided without accurate arousal state determination, then productivity is maintained, but reliability of feedback deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system where the arousal state determination unit continuously monitors physiological and behavioral indices, calculates the current arousal state, and provides feedback to the user. This feedback enables users to adjust their state and achieve optimal arousal levels, ensuring both reliable feedback and maintained productivity through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230397867A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
Publication Date: 2023.12.14 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US20230397867A1 patent drawing
  • US20230397867A1 patent drawing
  • US20230397867A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided an information processing apparatus, an information processing method, and a program enabling to present more appropriate feedback. An arousal state determination unit determines which state among hyperarousal, optimal arousal, and hypoarousal an arousal state of a user is in, and a feedback information generation unit generates feedback information for the user on the basis of the determined arousal state. The technology according to the present disclosure can be applied to, for example, a wearable device.