Real-Time Arpeggio Grid Editing for MIDI Performance Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional arpeggiators are difficult to use, limited in application, and require extensive tinkering to generate harmonically pleasing sequences, making them less useful for many users.

Innovation Solution

A software-based arpeggiator system that allows real-time editing of arpeggio performance data, including velocity, note type, and rhythmic order, enabling users to capture and edit arpeggios in a grid interface, apply changes to subsequent chords, and create new sequences based on captured performance data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional arpeggiators are used to automatically step through note sequences, then arpeggio automation is achieved, but the device becomes difficult and cumbersome to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearpeggio automationVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The arpeggiator interface is segmented into distinct functional areas: a performance capture area where users input chords, a grid display area showing the arpeggiated sequence, and a editing area where performance data can be modified. This segmentation allows users to interact with different aspects of arpeggio creation separately, reducing cognitive load and improving ease of use while maintaining full automation capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically generating the arpeggiated note sequence from the input chord before the user needs to edit it. The arpeggiator pre-calculates and displays the note sequence, velocity values, and rhythmic positioning, allowing users to then make informed edits without having to manually construct the entire sequence from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If conventional arpeggiators provide pre-programmed sequences, then arpeggio generation is enabled, but extensive tinkering is required to generate harmonically pleasing sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearpeggio generationVSAvoidtime for tinkering
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate visual feedback by displaying the generated arpeggio sequence in a grid format that shows note positions, velocities, and timing. Users can see the harmonical structure and make real-time adjustments to velocity and rhythmic positioning, allowing rapid iteration and refinement of harmonically pleasing sequences without extensive trial and error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables easy parameter changes by allowing users to modify velocity values, note timing, and rhythmic positioning directly in the grid interface. Users can adjust individual note parameters or apply global changes to the entire sequence, facilitating quick experimentation with different harmonical interpretations without requiring extensive reprogramming

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional arpeggiators are used, then basic arpeggio functionality is provided, but the application is limited and requires extensive tinkering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication scopeVSAvoidcomplexity of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arpeggiator is designed as a multi-functional tool that can capture performance data, display sequences in a visual grid, edit individual note parameters, apply edits to subsequent chords, and generate variations of the original sequence. This universal design allows a single interface to handle multiple arpeggio creation tasks that would otherwise require separate tools or extensive configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides dynamic control over arpeggio parameters including velocity, timing, and rhythmic positioning. Users can dynamically adjust these parameters during performance or editing, and the system automatically applies changes to subsequent chords, allowing the arpeggiator to adapt to different musical contexts and styles without requiring complex reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9105260B1Grid-editing of a live-played arpeggio
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 APPLE INC
  • US9105260B1 patent drawing
  • US9105260B1 patent drawing
  • US9105260B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including receiving a first set of performance data corresponding to a first plurality of MIDI-based notes in a first rhythmic order. The first plurality of MIDI-based notes may form a first arpeggio, with each of the first plurality of notes having a corresponding first performance data. The method further includes receiving input data indicating a change to the first performance data corresponding to a note in the first plurality of notes, changing the first performance data for the corresponding note using the input data, receiving a second set of performance data corresponding to a second plurality of MIDI-based notes, and applying the changed first performance data to the second performance data. Applying the first changed performance data includes editing the second set of performance data in real-time by replacing the second performance data with the changed first performance data.