Aperiodic Array Antenna Scan Loss Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aperiodic array antennas experience significant scan losses and inefficiencies when beams are pointed away from the boresight direction or cover broad fields of view due to their directive radiation patterns and large inter-element spacing, leading to reduced aperture efficiency and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

A method for manufacturing array antennas with shaped radiation patterns, where radiating elements are designed to have different sizes related to their spacing, and are arranged in a layout that approximates a target angular dependence of directivity over a required field of view, using a design phase that includes synthesizing an array layout and choosing radiating elements with specific radiation patterns to achieve a flat or increasing radiation pattern across the field of view.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If aperiodic arrays with large inter-element spacing are used to reduce the number of radiators, then device complexity is reduced, but aperture efficiency deteriorates and scan losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of radiatorsVSAvoidaperture efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the amplitude excitation of individual radiating elements according to a tapered distribution. Elements at the aperture edges have lower excitation amplitude compared to central elements, which compensates for the reduced aperture utilization caused by large inter-element spacing. This local adjustment of excitation characteristics optimizes the overall aperture efficiency while maintaining the reduced number of radiators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If radiators with different dimensions are employed to maximize aperture efficiency in non-regular arrays, then aperture efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaperture efficiencyVSAvoidradiator dimension variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs homogeneity by using identical radiating elements throughout the array aperture. All elements have the same physical dimensions and characteristics, differing only in their excitation amplitude and phase. This uniformity simplifies the design, manufacturing, and maintenance of the array while achieving optimal aperture efficiency through controlled excitation distributions rather than varied element geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

3Adaptability or versatility

If beams are scanned away from boresight direction in arrays with directive radiation patterns, then field of view coverage is improved, but scan losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of view coverageVSAvoidscan losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing electronic beam steering through dynamic adjustment of phase and amplitude excitation across the array elements. The beam direction can be continuously changed without mechanical movement, and the excitation distribution is optimized for each scan angle to maintain consistent gain and minimize scan losses across the entire field of view coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If phased array antennas are designed for electronic beam reconfigurability, then adaptability is improved, but power efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam electronic reconfigurabilityVSAvoidpower efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes power efficiency by carefully controlling the amplitude and phase parameters of each radiating element. The excitation distribution is designed to maximize the power radiated in the desired beam direction while minimizing power lost to sidelobes and other inefficiencies. This parameter optimization allows electronic reconfigurability to be achieved with improved power efficiency compared to conventional phased arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2697865B1Array antenna having a radiation pattern with a controlled envelope, and method of manufacturing it
Publication Date: 2019.02.13 EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY
  • EP2697865B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B
  • EP2697865B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP2697865B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method for manufacturing an array antenna (AA) comprising: - a design phase, comprising synthesizing an array layout of said array antenna and choosing or designing radiating elements (R) to be arranged according to said array layout; and - a phase of physically making said array antenna, comprising arranging said radiating elements according to said array layout; said design phase comprising the steps of: a) synthesizing an array layout complying with a required minimum beamwidth, a required field of view (FOV), a required side lobe level and a target angular dependence of the maximum directivity of the array antenna over said required field of view; b) determining shaped radiation patterns of said radiating elements in order to approximate said target angular dependence of the maximum directivity of the array antenna over said required field of view; and c) choosing or designing radiating elements having the shaped radiation patterns determined at said step b).