Adjustable Arrhythmia Detection Sensitivity via Risk Level Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing physiological information measurement devices struggle to accurately detect arrhythmia across diverse levels from mild to severe, often resulting in either false alarms or overlooked arrhythmias due to the difficulty in setting optimal determination criteria for patients of varying levels.
Innovation Solution
A physiological information measurement device equipped with a risk level determination unit that analyzes electrocardiographic waveforms to determine the occurrence risk of arrhythmia in multiple levels, allowing the arrhythmia monitoring unit to adjust its detection sensitivity accordingly, enabling accurate monitoring and alarm output.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If the determination criterion is set to increase arrhythmia detection sensitivity, then the possibility of detecting arrhythmia is improved, but the possibility of generating false alarm increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamics by making the determination criterion adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically changes the arrhythmia determination criterion based on the patient's risk level, which is calculated from multiple parameters including age, sex, heart rate, and electrocardiographic waveforms. This allows the monitoring system to adapt its sensitivity to each patient's specific condition, resolving the contradiction between detection sensitivity and false alarm rate.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter of determination criterion based on risk level. By calculating a risk level from multiple patient-specific parameters and using this risk level to select or adjust the determination criterion, the system optimizes arrhythmia detection for each patient while minimizing false alarms. The risk level serves as an intermediate parameter that links patient characteristics to appropriate monitoring sensitivity.
2Reliability
If the determination criterion is set to suppress false alarm, then the reliability is improved, but the possibility of overlooking true arrhythmia increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system dynamically adjusts the determination criterion based on the calculated risk level. For patients with higher risk levels, the system uses more sensitive criteria to prevent overlooking true arrhythmia, while for lower risk patients, less sensitive criteria reduce false alarms. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the criterion flexible rather than fixed.
Solution Approach 2:
The determination criterion parameter is changed according to the risk level derived from multiple patient-specific parameters. This parameter change ensures that each patient receives monitoring with appropriate sensitivity - high sensitivity for high-risk patients to avoid missing arrhythmia, and lower sensitivity for low-risk patients to reduce false alarms.
3Device complexity
If a single determination criterion is used for all patients, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to diverse patient levels deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the patient population into different risk levels based on calculated risk parameters. By dividing patients into groups (e.g., high risk, medium risk, low risk) and assigning different determination criteria to each segment, the system achieves patient-specific optimization without requiring completely separate monitoring systems for each patient type. This segmentation maintains reasonable system complexity while improving adaptability.
Solution Approach 2:
The risk level calculation system serves multiple functions: it assesses patient risk, determines appropriate monitoring criteria, and guides treatment decisions. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to handle diverse patient needs without requiring separate specialized systems for each patient type, maintaining universality while achieving customization.
Data Source
AI summary
A physiological information measurement device includes: a risk level determination unit configured to analyze an electrocardiographic waveform measured by a measurement unit and to determine an occurrence risk of arrhythmia in a plurality of levels; and an arrhythmia monitoring unit configured to monitor the arrhythmia, in accordance with a level of the occurrence risk of the arrhythmia determined by the risk level determination unit.


