Automated Art Therapy Analysis System for Objective Psychological Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Art therapy techniques lack objectivity, consistency, and reliability due to their dependence on subjective therapist experience and judgment, making them less effective in accurately analyzing and evaluating psychological states and disorders.

Innovation Solution

A computer system and medium that provide a drawing module for presenting patterns, an analysis module for evaluating psychological states and disorders from drawn images, and a database for storing patterns and art therapy knowledge, enabling objective and consistent evaluation through automated analysis and matching of factors against established art therapy knowledge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If art therapy assessment techniques are used, then psychological status can be evaluated, but objectivity and consistency are compromised due to subjective therapist judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual, subjective assessment process with an automated computer-based system that uses image processing and pattern recognition algorithms to analyze drawings objectively, eliminating human subjectivity from the evaluation process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer between the drawing and the evaluation result, using automated analysis modules to process drawing features and map them to psychological indicators through predefined rules and algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If automated analysis is implemented, then objectivity and consistency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconsistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex art therapy evaluation process into distinct modular components: drawing acquisition module, feature extraction module, pattern recognition module, and evaluation generation module, allowing each to be developed and maintained independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated analysis system is designed to handle multiple types of art therapy assessments and drawing formats through a unified platform, making the complexity reusable across different assessment scenarios rather than requiring separate systems for each

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8942443B2Computer system and computer-readable storage medium for art therapy
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 KOREA UNIV IND & ACADEMIC CALLABORATION FOUND
  • US8942443B2 patent drawing
  • US8942443B2 patent drawing
  • US8942443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An art therapy computer system and a computer-readable storage medium having recorded a program for art therapy are disclosed. An aspect of the present invention provides a computer system that includes a drawing module, which presents a plurality of patterns and in which the drawing module selects a certain pattern, composes and colors a picture according to the working of a person tested for art therapy, an analysis module, which analyzes one or more factors from the colored picture, and a parsing module, which parses the psychological state, symptoms or disorders of the person tested for art therapy from the analyzed factors.