Arteriovenous Tree Separation via Vessel Potential Connectivity Map

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automated segmentation of retinal vessels in fundus photographs are limited in separating arterial from venous trees, often relying on local information and being prone to errors due to imperfections in imaging and vessel extraction, and are generally greedy, leading to potential misclassification and propagation of errors.

Innovation Solution

A framework that generates a vessel potential connectivity map (VPCM) to separate overlapping tree structures into distinct arterial and venous trees by modeling the problem as a graph optimization problem, using a meta-heuristic algorithm to find near-optimal solutions that fit the retinal vasculature topology, and dynamically adjusting vessel segments to resolve connectivity issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If local and greedy segmentation methods are used for vessel separation, then the method is simple to implement, but the accuracy deteriorates due to error propagation and susceptibility to imaging imperfections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidseparation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vessel separation problem into distinct phases: initial segmentation using local methods, error identification, and global optimization. This allows the system to benefit from simple local methods while correcting their limitations through subsequent global processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where segmentation results are evaluated, errors are identified, and corrections are applied iteratively. The system uses feedback from imaging quality assessment to adjust separation parameters and reduce error propagation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If sophisticated global optimization methods are used for vessel separation, then the accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by conducting initial vessel segmentation and identifying potential error regions before applying complex global optimization. This preliminary processing reduces the scope and computational burden of subsequent sophisticated methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of processing complexity to different regions: simple methods for clear regions and sophisticated optimization only where needed (at crossing points and ambiguous regions). This localized approach maintains accuracy while reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If local greedy methods are used for vessel separation, then the processing speed is fast, but reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to errors in low-contrast images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidseparation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial sophisticated processing only to critical regions (vessel crossings and ambiguous areas) rather than processing the entire image with complex methods. This maintains fast processing speed while improving reliability where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary processing steps including quality assessment modules and error detection mechanisms that mediate between fast local methods and reliable global optimization, ensuring speed is maintained while reliability is improved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If error propagation is allowed in the segmentation process, then the processing is simpler and faster, but the final accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidfinal segmentation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent prepares for potential errors by implementing error detection and correction mechanisms in advance. The system cushions against error propagation by continuously monitoring segmentation quality and applying corrections before errors can spread through the processing pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS10360672B2Automated separation of binary overlapping trees
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 VETERANS AFFAIRS U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY
  • US10360672B2 patent drawing
  • US10360672B2 patent drawing
  • US10360672B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are systems and methods for analyzing images. An exemplary method can comprise receiving at least one image having one or more annotations indicating a feature. The method can comprise generating training images from the at least one image. Each training image can be based on a respective section of the at least one image. The training images can comprise positive images having the feature and negative images without the feature. The method can comprise generating a feature space based on the positive images and the negative images. The method can further comprise identifying the feature in one or more unclassified images based upon the feature space.