Arthritis Severity Analysis Using AI Region Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current diagnostic methods for degenerative arthritis lack accuracy due to subjective interpretation by medical staff, leading to inconsistent treatment and potential health insurance issues, and AI-based diagnosis struggles with clear rationale and boundary deviations in abnormality classification.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing an image collection unit, region detection unit, individual analysis unit, and integrated analysis unit to analyze medical images with AI models for precise quantification and classification of arthritis severity, including severity of osteoproliferation and subchondral bone hardness, through automatic region detection and feature extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If AI-based diagnosis is used to improve reading accuracy, then diagnostic precision is improved, but the ability to present clear rationale and avoid boundary deviations is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic precisionVSAvoidrationale clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnosis process is segmented into multiple independent modules: region detection module identifies specific areas of interest, individual analysis module evaluates each region separately for arthritis features, and integrated analysis module synthesizes results. This segmentation allows clear rationale presentation by showing which regions were analyzed and what features were detected in each, while maintaining high diagnostic precision through systematic evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary explanation layer between the AI diagnosis and the final classification. This intermediary module generates detailed rationales by mapping detected features to diagnostic criteria, providing transparent reasoning that explains how the AI reached its conclusions. This mediator presents clear rationale while maintaining the precision of AI-based diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If AI models are trained to classify arthritis severity, then automated diagnosis is improved, but deviations among models at boundary grades are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated diagnosisVSAvoidclassification consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple parameter thresholds and grading criteria that can be adjusted based on the specific boundary conditions. By changing the evaluation parameters dynamically according to the detected features and their positions relative to boundary values, the system achieves consistent and reliable classification across different models, reducing deviations at boundary grades while maintaining high automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated analysis module incorporates feedback mechanisms that review individual region analyses and adjust the final classification accordingly. This feedback loop ensures consistency by identifying and correcting deviations in boundary cases, while the entire process remains automated. The feedback mechanism aligns multiple models' outputs and maintains reliability in automated diagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If subjective reading by medical staff is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but measurement precision and treatment consistency are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis accessibilityVSAvoiddiagnosis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting regions, extracting features, and classifying arthritis severity without requiring medical staff intervention. The automated process maintains ease of operation through user-friendly interfaces while significantly improving measurement precision through consistent, objective analysis. The system serves itself by performing diagnostic tasks that previously required human expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human reading and interpretation with an automated AI-based system. This substitution eliminates the variability inherent in subjective reading while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing. The mechanical action of human eyes and brain is replaced by computational algorithms that provide precise, consistent measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12109037B2Apparatus and method for precise analysis of severity of arthritis
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 CRESCOM CO LTD
  • US12109037B2 patent drawing
  • US12109037B2 patent drawing
  • US12109037B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for a precise analysis of a severity of arthritis includes an image collection unit configured to collect a medical image having captured a joint of a user, a region detection unit configured to detect one or more regions of interest for analyzing arthritis in the medical image through a learned automatic region detection model, an individual analysis unit configured to extract quantitative feature values from the detected regions of interest and derives one or more individual analysis data from among a severity of arthritis, a severity of osteoproliferation, and a severity of hardness of a subchondral bone based on the feature values, and an integrated analysis unit configured to finely classify a severity of degenerative arthritis through an integrated analysis model learned based on the individual analysis data.