Article Scoring System for Content Relevance and Resource Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reader aggregators are inefficient in analyzing and configuring content, leading to a time-consuming process for users to find new articles and a drain on computing device resources, with limited ability to determine article quality and relevance.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a content miner, article scorer, and database to analyze and score articles based on quality and user interaction metrics, adjusting priorities and scores to provide the most relevant articles to users while maintaining user privacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If reader aggregators download all new articles from websites, then users can access comprehensive content, but computing device resources are drained and users must manually check websites frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent quantityVSAvoiddevice resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of articles immediately upon receipt, determining quality scores and relevance before users need to access them. This advance processing allows the system to pre-filter and pre-rank content, so users receive only the most relevant articles without needing to manually check websites or consume device resources for downloading irrelevant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The reader aggregator system automatically monitors websites, downloads new articles, analyzes their quality, and updates the user interface without requiring manual user intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing the entire content lifecycle from acquisition to presentation, eliminating the need for users to manually check websites while conserving their device resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If reader aggregators provide all new articles from subscribed websites, then users have access to complete information feeds, but the system cannot effectively analyze or configure content relevance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidcontent quality assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual or simple mechanical filtering methods with automated electronic analysis and scoring mechanisms. By using computer-based algorithms to analyze article content, metadata, and user preferences, the system can precisely measure and assess content quality and relevance, transforming the content filtering process from a crude mechanical operation to a sophisticated electronic measurement system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used to evaluate content by introducing multiple scoring dimensions including quality metrics, relevance factors, and user preference weights. Instead of relying on a single parameter like recency or source, the system dynamically adjusts and combines multiple parameters to determine article priority and display order, enabling precise control over content presentation while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If users manually access websites to check for new content, then they can control what they read, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent access convenienceVSAvoidtime to find new articles
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user interactions with articles (reading behavior, preferences, and selections) are continuously monitored and used to adjust future content recommendations. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from user behavior and automatically refine its content selection and presentation, making the system increasingly aligned with user preferences over time without requiring manual effort from users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary organization and ranking of articles based on user preferences and quality metrics before users need to access them. By pre-processing and pre-organizing content in accordance with individual user profiles, the system eliminates the time users would otherwise spend searching through websites, delivering personalized content feeds ready for immediate consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If reader aggregators collect all articles without analysis, then they serve as simple conduits, but analysis and configuration capabilities are severely limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcontent analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the content analysis function into distinct modular components including quality assessment modules, relevance determination modules, and user preference matching modules. Each module handles a specific aspect of content analysis independently, allowing the system to maintain overall structural simplicity while incorporating sophisticated analysis capabilities through organized functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10162864B2Reader application system utilizing article scoring and clustering
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 APPLE INC
  • US10162864B2 patent drawing
  • US10162864B2 patent drawing
  • US10162864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure involve a mobile or computer reader application that obtains articles or other computer files from a central database and displays the articles to a user of the device. In addition to providing the articles to the reader application, an article providing system may also determine the quality or popularity of particular articles and provide the most popular articles to users of the system. In one embodiment, the system may receive one or more anonymous interaction metrics from one or more devices connected to the system. The anonymous interaction metrics may be associated with a particular article and provide some indication of a user's engagement with the article. The system utilizes these interaction metrics or measurements to set or adjust a score or ranking associated with the particular article. The score may then be utilized by the system to rank the article in relation to other articles available through the system to provide the most popular or highest ranked articles to users of the system.