Articular Surface Implant Delivery via Articulating Feature Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for replacing damaged articular cartilage, such as abrasion arthroplasty and microfracture, face challenges with durability and accessibility, particularly in joints like the knee, hip, and shoulder, where direct access is difficult, leading to invasive procedures and prolonged recovery.

Innovation Solution

A biocompatible implant with a load-bearing surface designed to replace a portion of the articular surface, featuring a tapered proximal end and grooves for securement, which can be delivered through a cooperating articulating feature system, allowing for minimally invasive installation and alignment with the articular surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional abrasion arthroplasty or microfracture procedures are used to treat articular cartilage defects, then natural healing response is stimulated, but the resulting fibrocartilage lacks durability and cannot support long-term weight bearing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability of cartilage repairVSAvoidlong-term weight bearing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of the repair approach by replacing biological healing stimulation with a mechanical implant solution. The implant provides immediate structural support and durable load-bearing capability, transforming the repair mechanism from biological (fibrocartilage formation) to mechanical (prosthetic replacement), thereby resolving the contradiction between stimulating healing and achieving long-term durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If direct access procedures are used to replace articular surface, then implant installation is straightforward, but invasive procedures are required for hard-to-reach joints like superior femoral head, medial humeral head, and glenoid

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to implant siteVSAvoidinvasiveness of procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a delivery system as an intermediary mechanism that bridges the gap between the external environment and hard-to-reach implant sites. This delivery system enables minimally invasive insertion by mediating the transfer of the implant through narrow access paths to the target location, thereby resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Area of stationary object

If large diameter lesions are treated with cartilage transplant, then defect coverage is achieved, but the procedure requires donor pegs that may exceed available capacity within the same knee joint

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect coverage areaVSAvoiddonor peg availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the solution from the constraint by using an implant that can be manufactured to any required size rather than relying on donor pegs of limited availability. The implant is designed as a standalone component that can be customized to match the defect area, thereby resolving the contradiction between covering large defects and having sufficient donor material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of time

If minimally invasive procedures are used for implant delivery, then recovery time is reduced, but precise alignment and securement of the implant become more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery periodVSAvoidalignment precision of implant
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing the implant site and creating appropriate receiving structures (such as tunnels or recesses) before implant insertion. This pre-preparation ensures that when the implant is delivered minimally invasively, precise alignment is achieved through the pre-established geometric constraints, thereby resolving the contradiction between reduced recovery time and maintained alignment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7828853B2Articular surface implant and delivery system
Publication Date: 2010.11.09 ARTHROSURFACE INC
  • US7828853B2 patent drawing
  • US7828853B2 patent drawing
  • US7828853B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for delivering an implant for replacing a portion of an articular surface. The method may include forming a socket in an articulating feature that is capable of moving relative to the articular surface. An implant may be placed in the socket and the articulating feature may be moved relative to the articular surface to generally align the socket with an implant site formed in the articular surface. The implant may be transferred from the socket into the implant site.