Articulating Vertebral Rod Insertion Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Minimally invasive spine surgery techniques face challenges in inserting vertebral fixation members, particularly due to limited access and the need for precise rod placement, which can result in increased tissue damage and longer recovery times.

Innovation Solution

An articulating insertion device with an outer guide tube, pin assembly, and pusher member that allows for controlled pivoting of the elongate stabilization member from a parallel to a perpendicular orientation, enabling more precise placement and reducing tissue damage by allowing longer rods to be used without additional incisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional open spine surgery techniques are used, then precise rod placement can be achieved, but extensive tissue damage and muscle retraction occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverod placement precisionVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The insertion device is divided into multiple functional segments: an outer guide tube for structural support and direction, an inner pusher member for actuating rod movement, and a clamping mechanism for securing the rod. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while minimizing overall tissue disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The insertion device acts as an intermediary tool that bridges the gap between the surgeon's control and the rod placement. It provides a controlled interface for delivering the rod to the target location through a minimally invasive path, reducing direct tissue manipulation while maintaining placement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If minimally invasive techniques with limited access are used, then tissue damage is reduced, but rod insertion control and precision are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue damageVSAvoidrod insertion control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The insertion device incorporates dynamic elements including a movable pusher member that can be actuated to push the rod, and a clamping mechanism that can engage and disengage the rod. These dynamic features provide the surgeon with controlled manipulation capabilities through a minimally invasive access point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes the longitudinal dimension of the guide tube to provide leverage and control for rod insertion. By extending the guide tube through the minimally invasive access point and using the pusher member along the same axis, the surgeon gains mechanical advantage and control without requiring wider exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If fixed position rod holders are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but rod placement flexibility and precision are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion device structureVSAvoidrod placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The insertion device transitions from a fixed position to a dynamic positioning system where the pusher member can move along the guide tube and the clamping mechanism can engage at different positions. This dynamic capability allows precise rod placement while maintaining relative structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If shorter rods are used to accommodate limited incision access, then insertion feasibility is improved, but spinal stabilization effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion feasibilityVSAvoidspinal stabilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The extended guide tube provides an extended working dimension through the minimally invasive access point, allowing longer rods to be delivered and positioned correctly without requiring larger incisions. This dimensional extension reconciles insertion feasibility with stabilization effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11357552B2Devices and methods for inserting a vertebral fixation member
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US11357552B2 patent drawing
  • US11357552B2 patent drawing
  • US11357552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems, and methods for inserting a vertebral stabilization member, such as a rod. The insertion device includes an outer guide tube, a pin assembly including a pin and a pusher member extending therethrough. The insertion device is configured to actuate a rod between a first orientation and a second orientation angled with respect to the first orientation in order to position the rod in an appropriate location for attachment to bone.