Articulating Windguard for Agricultural Baler Crop Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing windguards for hay balers struggle to accommodate varying crop flows efficiently, leading to issues such as crop accumulation and reduced throughput, especially when dealing with light or bulky materials and uneven terrain.

Innovation Solution

A windguard with articulating features, including L-shaped support arms and a transversely extending crop hold-down device with a pivoting panel, allows for independent movement to accommodate uneven crop flows and heavy inflows, combined with a system of stub augers that consolidate and direct crop materials effectively into the baler.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a fixed windguard is used, then the structure is simple and stable, but it cannot accommodate varying crop flows efficiently leading to crop accumulation and reduced throughput

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidwindguard structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The windguard is transformed from a fixed structure to a dynamic one by introducing articulating support arms that allow the windguard to pivot and adjust its position. This enables the windguard to adapt to varying crop flows and terrain conditions, preventing crop accumulation and maintaining throughput without requiring complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The windguard structure is divided into multiple segments including support arms, cross members, and panels that can move independently. This segmentation allows different parts of the windguard to respond to local crop flow conditions, improving overall effectiveness while keeping each individual component relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a rigid windguard structure is used, then manufacturing is simple, but it cannot accommodate uneven terrain and heavy crop inflows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of crop flow variationsVSAvoidwindguard construction
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The windguard incorporates articulating support arms with pivot points that allow the structure to dynamically adjust to uneven terrain and heavy crop inflows. This dynamic capability provides adaptability without requiring complex active control systems, maintaining ease of manufacture through passive mechanical adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The windguard structure changes its geometric parameters (position, angle) in response to varying crop flow conditions and terrain. The articulating arms allow the windguard to alter its configuration passively, adapting to different operating conditions without requiring complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the windguard is fixed in position, then the structure is stable, but crop materials can accumulate underneath leading to plugging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous material flowVSAvoidarticulating mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The articulating support arms allow the windguard to dynamically adjust its position in response to crop accumulation. When materials build up underneath, the weight causes the arms to pivot, raising the windguard to relieve the accumulation and prevent plugging, maintaining continuous material flow through passive mechanical response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The articulating mechanism provides passive feedback control where the weight of accumulated crop materials directly causes the support arms to pivot and adjust the windguard position. This automatic feedback mechanism prevents plugging by relieving accumulation without requiring sensors or active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7650741B2Articulating windguard for agricultural baler
Publication Date: 2010.01.26 AGCO CORP
  • US7650741B2 patent drawing
  • US7650741B2 patent drawing
  • US7650741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A windguard is adapted to be attached to the frame of a crop pickup in overlying relationship to the pickup tine rotor so as to control the incoming flow of crop materials. A transversely extending crop hold down portion of the windguard is pivotally supported between the front ends of a pair of fore-and-aft extending support arms that are pivotally attached at their rear ends to the frame of the pickup so that the windguard can articulate as it is moved up and down relative to the pickup by engagement with inflowing crop material.