Software Artifact Consistency Analysis for Cross-Language Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In software development, maintaining semantic and syntactic consistency across components written in different languages and technologies is challenging, often leading to undetected consistency errors that can cause minor issues or catastrophic failures, especially when artifacts predate the referencing code and are written in different languages.

Innovation Solution

A method is provided to generate a user interface for input related to components, collect information about referenced artifacts, and store this information in a database for analysis, enabling real-time debugging and consistency checking across disparate technologies and frameworks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If developers manually maintain consistency across artifacts written in different languages and technologies, then semantic and syntactic consistency can be achieved, but the complexity of development and maintenance increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveconsistencyVSAvoiddevelopment complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary consistency checking by analyzing artifact relationships and generating consistency rules before deployment. This advance analysis identifies potential consistency issues in artifacts written in different languages and technologies, allowing developers to fix problems before they manifest in production environments.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary consistency analysis system that mediates between diverse artifacts written in different languages and technologies. This intermediary layer translates and compares artifact metadata, relationships, and dependencies across different programming languages and technological frameworks, enabling consistency verification without requiring direct manual comparison.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If consistency errors are detected after deployment at runtime, then the application can handle diverse artifacts, but undetected errors may cause catastrophic failures with grave economic consequences

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveartifact compatibilityVSAvoidapplication stability

Core Design Contradiction:

Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that provide consistency validation results to developers during the development and testing phases. The system analyzes artifact relationships, generates consistency reports, and feeds this information back to developers, enabling them to correct issues before deployment and avoid catastrophic runtime failures.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If detailed knowledge of each artifact is required to maintain consistency, then consistency can be maintained, but the ease of operation decreases due to the learning curve and expertise required

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveconsistencyVSAvoiddeveloper ease of use

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service consistency analysis by automatically examining artifact metadata, relationships, and dependencies. Instead of requiring developers to manually analyze each artifact's details, the system autonomously generates consistency rules and validates relationships between artifacts, significantly reducing the expertise burden on developers.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Inventive Principle:

Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If real-time consistency analysis is implemented, then immediate feedback on errors is provided, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:

Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time

Core Design Contradiction:

ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential consistency-critical information from artifacts, such as metadata, relationships, and dependencies, rather than analyzing entire artifact contents. This extraction approach enables real-time consistency analysis by focusing computational resources on the most relevant aspects that affect consistency across different artifacts.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and analyzes specific consistency-relevant metadata and relationship information from artifacts rather than performing comprehensive analysis of entire artifact contents. This selective extraction enables faster real-time consistency checking while maintaining detection accuracy, as the system focuses on critical consistency-determining elements.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8010946B2Apparatus for analysing and organizing artifacts in a software application

Publication Date: 2011.08.30 ORACLE INT CORP

AI summary

In one embodiment, the invention provide a method comprising: generating a user interface to allow a user to make an input relating to a first component of an application; and if the input is related to an artifact, then presenting selected information about the artifact to the user. In another embodiment, invention provides a method comprising: collecting information about artifacts referenced by a statement in a first component of an application; and outputting run-time data for each artifact referenced by the statement to facilitate debugging of the first component.