Artificial Grass Decking with Exposed Rigid Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional decking is often bland in appearance, requires extensive maintenance, and poses slipping hazards, especially for elderly users, due to its artificial and slippery nature.

Innovation Solution

Decking comprising artificial grass with a rigid wood or wood-like support material, featuring exposed strips that mimic a lawn appearance, providing a stable and aesthetically pleasing surface while reducing slip risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional decking planks are used to provide a rigid level surface, then structural stability and load-bearing capacity are improved, but the surface becomes slippery when wet and appears bland and artificial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidslipping hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The decking combines artificial grass with a rigid support structure (wood, composite, or metal) to create a composite material system. This integrates the slip-resistant, natural appearance of grass with the structural strength and stability of rigid materials, resolving the contradiction between structural integrity and slip resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The artificial grass is applied specifically to the walking surface layer, while the rigid support structure remains underneath. This local application provides slip resistance where needed (on the surface) while maintaining structural strength in the support layer, addressing the contradiction between these two requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If traditional decking planks are used to provide a rigid level surface, then structural stability is improved, but the appearance becomes bland and artificial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The composite structure combines the natural aesthetic of artificial grass with the structural properties of rigid materials. The grass layer provides a natural, green appearance that eliminates the bland, artificial look of traditional decking, while the rigid support maintains structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The artificial grass is applied to the visible surface layer to improve aesthetics, while the rigid support structure underneath maintains structural stability. This local differentiation allows each layer to fulfill its primary function - aesthetics for the surface, strength for the support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Shape

If artificial grass is added to decking to improve appearance and reduce slipping, then aesthetic appearance and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial grass is implemented as a thin, flexible surface layer that can be easily applied to the rigid support structure. This minimizes the added complexity while achieving the desired aesthetic and safety improvements, as the grass layer conform s to the underlying structure rather than requiring a completely new complex design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Object-affected harmful factors

If artificial grass is added to decking to reduce slipping and improve appearance, then safety and aesthetics are improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslipping hazardVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The artificial grass is manufactured as a ready-to-apply thin film or mat that simplifies the manufacturing process. Rather than integrating grass fibers directly into the rigid material (which would be complex), the pre-manufactured grass layer can be easily attached to the rigid support, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while achieving slip resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentEP1904684B1decking
Publication Date: 2010.01.06 THE BUTCHER
  • EP1904684B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1904684B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1904684B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

Decking (1) comprising artificial grass (2) and a rigid support for said artificial grass can be constructed so that the material used for the rigid support provides at least one exposed region (3, 4) on the upper surface of the decking (1). This allows attractive decking (1) to be provided that can mimic strips of lawn (2) and can also provide a non-slip surface.