Artificial Reef Layout Using Self-Learning Site Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing artificial reef technologies lack a self-learning system capable of adapting to open-ended marine environments, integrating diverse expert knowledge, and optimizing design based on site-specific conditions for maximum ecological and economic impact.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method utilizing GIS data and customized algorithms for intelligent reef design, incorporating multi-layered design thinking, self-learning methodologies, and adaptive strategies to optimize reef placement and layout based on geographic, biological, and economic factors, including CFD analysis and fractal dimension calculations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional artificial reef designs are used, then construction is simple and materials are readily available, but the design does not adapt to site-specific conditions and lacks optimization for ecological and economic impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to site-specific conditionsVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of geographic data, terrain modeling, and restriction identification before reef design is finalized. This allows the design to be pre-optimized for specific site conditions including bathymetry, slopes, and environmental constraints, resolving the contradiction by preparing adaptive design parameters in advance without increasing final construction complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system varies design parameters such as reef shape, size, material composition, and spatial distribution based on analyzed site conditions including current patterns, wave action, and ecological goals. This allows the same basic reef technology to adapt to different locations while maintaining construction simplicity through parameterized design variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If detailed geographic analysis and customized algorithms are used, then reef design precision and ecological optimization are improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex design process into distinct computational modules: geographic data analysis, terrain 3D modeling, restriction identification, optimization algorithm execution, and design generation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, improving precision while managing system complexity through functional segmentation and modular processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary computational layer that processes geographic data and translates it into optimized reef design parameters. This intermediary processing layer acts as a bridge between raw site data and final design outputs, enabling precise adaptation without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If iterative evolutionary design approaches are used, then reef designs better meet ecological and economic requirements, but computation time and processing duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveecological and economic optimizationVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs iterative evolutionary algorithms that periodically evaluate and refine reef design solutions based on ecological and economic criteria. Rather than continuous computation, the system uses discrete generations of design optimization, where each iteration builds on previous results, achieving reliable optimization while controlling computation time through structured periodic evaluation cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4646927A1Computer implemented method of designing artificial reefs
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 UNDERWATER GARDENS INT SL
  • EP4646927A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2A
  • EP4646927A1 patent drawingFigure 2B~2C
  • EP4646927A1 patent drawingFigure 2D~3A

AI summary

Computer implemented method of designing artificial reefs (2), comprising the steps of i) analysing geographic data (3) of a selected site (1); ii) generating of a terrain 3D model (5) of the selected site (1) from the geographic data (3); iii) determining restrictions (41) in the terrain 3D model (5); iv) determining an optimized area (42) in the terrain 3D model (5); v) determining an optimized layout (43) of landing points (51) in the terrain 3D model (5), aimed specifically to a system or a method developed as a setup of self-learning algorithms, which allows it to perform and evolve in an sea open-ended environment.