Artificial turf for landscape and sports

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current artificial turfs fail to effectively mimic the volume effect and density of natural grass, and lack adequate shock-absorbing properties and drainage, making them less desirable for landscape and sports applications.

Innovation Solution

The development of artificial turf with a mechanically bounded layer of fibers that decreases in density from the bottom to the top, providing structural support and shock-absorption, and featuring a velour-like surface created through needle-punching, which eliminates the need for infill materials and enhances water drainage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional artificial turf is made with uniform density and infill materials, then structural support is provided, but shock-absorbing properties and natural grass mimicry are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock-absorbing propertiesVSAvoidturf structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a density gradient within the fiber layer, where fiber density varies from the bottom to the top surface. This gradient structure provides different local properties: higher density at the bottom for structural support and lower density at the top for shock absorption and natural grass mimicry, resolving the contradiction between structural strength and shock-absorbing properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining fibers of different densities and properties within a single layer. The fiber layer comprises a mixture of fibers with varying densities, creating a composite structure that simultaneously provides structural support and shock absorption without requiring separate infill materials, thus reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If infill materials are used to provide cushioning and support, then structural stability is improved, but drainage capability and eco-friendliness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddrainage obstruction and environmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the infill material layer entirely, replacing it with a self-supporting fiber layer that has engineered density gradient. This removal of infill materials directly improves drainage capability by eliminating the barrier to water penetration and eliminates the environmental concerns associated with rubber and sand infills, while maintaining structural stability through the gradient structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fiber layer serves multiple functions simultaneously - it provides structural support, shock absorption, and drainage capability all in one self-contained layer. The density gradient structure enables the fibers to self-organize into a configuration that naturally provides both stability and permeability without requiring additional infill materials, making the system self-sufficient and eco-friendly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Volume of stationary object

If fiber density is increased to mimic natural grass volume effect, then visual realism improves, but water drainage and surface breathability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrass volume effectVSAvoidwater drainage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating spatial variation in fiber density within the layer. The density is not uniform but varies from bottom to top, with higher density regions providing volume effect and lower density regions allowing water penetration. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between visual realism and drainage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous material principles by creating a fiber layer with controlled void spaces and permeability. The density gradient structure inherently creates porosity channels that allow water to flow through while maintaining the visual volume effect. The porous structure enables simultaneous achievement of grass-like appearance and effective drainage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a more natural feel and improved wear and drainage properties, allowing for efficient water drainage and reduced surface compaction, while being eco-friendly and recyclable, thus addressing the shortcomings of existing artificial turfs.

Implementation Method 1

The mechanically bounded layer of fibers provides structural support and shock-absorption

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

a velour-like surface created through needle-punching

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical binding: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

allowing for efficient water drainage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven drainage: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS10190267B2Artificial turf for landscape and sports
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 BFS EURO NV
  • US10190267B2 patent drawing
  • US10190267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention seeks to provide artificial turf that imitates more closely the root zone, the volume effect, and density of natural grass and that has an improved wear and drainage property. An artificial turf adapted for use in landscape and sports applications comprises a mechanically bounded layer of fibers formed as a non-woven matting made of one or more natural and/or synthetic fibers. A plurality of tufts of pile yarn is inserted through the mechanically bounded layer of fibers. A backing is applied at the backside of the mechanically bounded layer of fibers enhancing anchoring the tufts to the mechanically bounded layer of fibers.