ML Artwork Appraisal With Blockchain Audit Traceability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying the provenance of valuable objects such as art and antiquities are subjective, expensive, and lack comprehensive documentation, necessitating improved technological systems for authentication and appraisal.

Innovation Solution

An automated assessment system using a machine learning model and distributed ledger to analyze images of objects, identify reference features, calculate appraised values, and generate audit reports, with the option to record on a blockchain for immutability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional provenance verification methods (comparative techniques, expert opinions, scientific tests) are used, then authentication accuracy may be maintained, but the process becomes expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of physical artworks through high-resolution imaging and stores them on a blockchain ledger. These digital replicas contain embedded metadata and provenance information that can be verified without handling the original artwork, eliminating the need for time-consuming physical examinations by experts while maintaining authentication reliability through cryptographic verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual expert examination and physical scientific testing with automated machine learning models that analyze digital images. The system uses trained neural networks to authenticate artworks by comparing them against known patterns and provenance data stored on the blockchain, substituting human expertise and laboratory equipment with algorithmic analysis that operates instantly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If conventional provenance verification methods are used, then comprehensive authentication may be achieved, but costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidverification cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of physical artworks through high-resolution imaging and stores them on a blockchain ledger. These digital replicas contain embedded metadata and provenance information that can be verified without handling the original artwork, eliminating the need for time-consuming physical examinations by experts while maintaining authentication reliability through cryptographic verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a self-service authentication system where the blockchain ledger automatically verifies provenance claims through smart contracts. The system autonomously compares submitted artwork data against stored records and cryptographic signatures, eliminating the need for expensive human expert intervention while maintaining high authentication accuracy through decentralized consensus mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If human experts perform provenance verification, then nuanced judgment may be applied, but subjectivity and inconsistency arise between evaluators

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual expert examination and physicalscientific testing with automated machine learning models that analyze digital images. The system uses trained neural networks to authenticate artworks by comparing them against known patterns and provenance data stored on the blockchain, substituting human expertise and laboratory equipment with algorithmic analysis that operates instantly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms subjective expert judgment into objective measurable parameters by training machine learning models on large datasets of authenticated artworks. The system converts nuanced artistic evaluation into quantifiable features such as brushstroke patterns, material composition ratios, and stylistic metricsthat can be consistently measured and compared, eliminating human subjectivity while capturing the complexity of artistic authentication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If scientific tests are used for provenance verification, then objective data may be obtained, but the process becomes expensive and incomplete

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata objectivityVSAvoidtesting cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual expert examination and physicalscientific testing with automated machine learning models that analyze digital images. The system uses trained neural networks to authenticate artworks by comparing them against known patterns and provenance data stored on the blockchain, substituting human expertise and laboratory equipment with algorithmic analysis that operates instantly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260010929A1System and method of automated assessment of objects using machine learning model and distributed ledger
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 QUOTIDIAN ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • US20260010929A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010929A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010929A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the disclosure provide a system and method of automated assessment of objections using a machine learning model. A method of the disclosure includes applying an image recognition model to an image of an object of interest to identify at least one reference feature of the object of interest from the image. The reference feature of the object of interest is analyzed via a machine learning model trained on a curated database of identifiable features. The curated database includes a listing of known art or collectibles cross-referenced to appraised values for each known art or collectible in the listing. The method includes calculating an appraised value for the object based on the analyzing and generating an audit report for the object of interest. The audit report includes a record of at least one item in the curated database used by the machine learning model to calculate the appraised value.