Asphalt Feeder Speed Control for Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional asphalt paving systems experience high feeder wear, material segregation, and lack of real-time asphalt level indicators, leading to inefficient operation and manual inspection requirements.

Innovation Solution

A system with a controller that simultaneously adjusts the speeds of multiple feeders based on a single operator input, incorporating sensors to monitor operational parameters and material levels, ensuring consistent material flow and reducing wear, while providing real-time asphalt level indicators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If feeders operate at high speed to maintain productivity, then material delivery rate increases, but feeder wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial delivery rateVSAvoidfeeder service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic speed control for feeders based on real-time asphalt level detection. The system adjusts feeder operating speeds according to actual material levels in the hopper, allowing high speed when material is abundant and reducing speed when material levels are low, thereby extending feeder service life while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs sensors to continuously monitor asphalt levels in the hopper and provides feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism enables the system to automatically adjust feeder speeds based on actual material availability, preventing excessive wear from continuous high-speed operation while maintaining optimal material delivery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If feeders operate independently with separate controls, then operational flexibility increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control of multiple feeders into a single integrated control system. Instead of independent controls for each feeder, the system uses one control interface that manages all feeders simultaneously, reducing operational complexity while maintaining the ability to adjust material flow rates as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal control system that handles multiple feeders through a single control mechanism. This multi-functional approach allows one control interface to manage various feeder speeds and operations, simplifying the overall control architecture while preserving operational flexibility for material delivery optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If manual inspection of asphalt levels is performed, then system simplicity is maintained, but time loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service monitoring where sensors automatically detect and report asphalt levels in the hopper without requiring manual inspection. The system serves itself by continuously monitoring its own material levels and providing real-time information to the control system, eliminating time-consuming manual checks while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with automated sensor-based detection. Instead of requiring physical inspection of asphalt levels, the system uses sensors to automatically measure and report material levels, eliminating time loss from manual inspection while keeping the overall system design simple and straightforward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If fixed speed control is used for feeders, then system simplicity is maintained, but material segregation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidmaterial uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from fixed speed control to dynamic speed adjustment based on real-time asphalt level detection. The system automatically varies feeder speeds according to material levels, preventing material segregation caused by excessive speed variations while maintaining control simplicity through automated regulation rather than complex manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses feedback from level sensors to automatically regulate feeder speeds. This feedback mechanism prevents material segregation by adjusting speeds based on actual material availability, maintaining material uniformity without requiring complex control systems, as the feedback loop automatically adapts speeds to prevent segregation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9777442B2System and method of applying material to a surface
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 WEILER & CO INC
  • US9777442B2 patent drawing
  • US9777442B2 patent drawing
  • US9777442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system including a first feeder configured to transport asphalt, a second feeder configured to receive the asphalt from the first feeder, and a controller configured to control a speed of the first feeder and the second feeder in response to an input from an operator.