ASR Audio Stream Compaction for Lower Transcription Charges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing audio stream processing systems incur high costs due to fixed pricing models for speech-to-text services, regardless of audio file duration, leading to inefficiencies and increased expenses for enterprises handling large volumes of short audio streams.

Innovation Solution

Implementing transaction-based and time-based audio stream processing techniques, where audio streams are optimized before transmission to ASR services, either by concatenating multiple streams into a single payload or compacting them to remove non-meaningful content, based on factors like network speed and cost structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If audio streams are transmitted individually to ASR services, then transcription accuracy is maintained, but transcription costs increase due to fixed pricing models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription accuracyVSAvoidtranscription costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple short audio streams into a single concatenated audio stream for batch processing by ASR services. This merging approach reduces the number of individual transcription requests, thereby lowering costs under fixed pricing models while maintaining transcription accuracy through proper stream separation markers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing audio streams before transmission to ASR services. This includes compacting audio data, removing silence periods, and organizing streams into batches, which optimizes transmission efficiency and reduces transcription costs before the actual transcription process occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If audio streams are compacted to remove non-meaningful content, then transmission frequency increases and costs decrease, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission frequencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes non-meaningful content from audio streams, such as silence periods and redundant segments, before transmission. This extraction process reduces audio file sizes and increases transmission frequency while managing processing complexity through targeted removal of specific content types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of energy

If multiple audio streams are concatenated into a single payload, then ASR service costs are reduced, but stream separation and identification become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveASR service costsVSAvoidstream separation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediary separation markers or delimiters between concatenated audio streams. These markers serve as mediators that enable the ASR service to easily identify and separate individual streams within the combined payload, reducing costs while eliminating the difficulty of stream separation through clear structural boundaries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If transcription services are used for every audio stream regardless of duration, then service coverage is complete, but cost efficiency decreases for short audio files

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidcost efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively processing audio streams based on their characteristics. Instead of transcribing every audio stream individually, the system batches multiple short streams together for combined transcription, achieving complete service coverage while improving cost efficiency through optimized resource utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260088030A1Methods to employ compaction in ASR service usage to reduce transcription charges
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 ADEIA GUIDES INC
  • US20260088030A1 patent drawing
  • US20260088030A1 patent drawing
  • US20260088030A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for processing audio streams are disclosed herein. An audio stream including speech content is received. The audio stream is compacted to generate a compacted audio stream and the compacted audio stream is transmitted to an automatic speech recognition (ASR) service for transcription of the speech content to text content. In response to transmitting the compacted audio stream for transcription, text content, a transcription of the audio stream, is received from the ASR service.