Assay Site Parameterization for Microarray Analysis Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated analysis of chemical assays in arrays is prone to errors, especially when dealing with unforeseen effects or marginal responses, as existing systems lack the ability to adapt parameters specific to each assay site, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that processes images of assay sites to determine site-specific parameters and metrics, allowing for unique criteria and thresholds for each site, enabling accurate assessment of reaction extent by comparing image metrics to reference functions and applying logic tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated determination of response is used, then throughput is high and speed is fast, but accuracy deteriorates due to errors in edge cases and unforeseen effects

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different analysis parameters and criteria specific to each assay site or type within the array. By localizing the analysis parameters to match the specific characteristics of each reaction site, the system maintains high throughput while improving accuracy for edge cases and unforeseen effects that require site-specific evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts analysis parameters based on the specific assay type and reaction characteristics at each site. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the automated system to adapt to different assay conditions, maintaining both high throughput and improved accuracy by selecting appropriate analysis criteria for each specific case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If manual review of response is performed, then accuracy is improved through expertise and human judgement, but productivity is low and time consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of site-specific parameterized analysis between automated image processing and final interpretation. This intermediary analysis layer applies expert-knowledge-based parameters to automated analysis, capturing human expertise in a computable form that maintains high throughput while improving accuracy for edge cases

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual human review with an automated parameterized analysis system that incorporates expert knowledge. By substituting mechanical human judgement with an automated system using site-specific parameters and criteria, the system achieves both high throughput and improved accuracy for automated determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If different assays are performed in different print areas, then versatility is improved, but device complexity increases due to need for multiple parameter sets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassay diversityVSAvoidparameter management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the array into different assay site types, each with its own parameter set. By dividing the array into distinct segments or zones corresponding to different assay types, the system manages complexity through organized parameter groups while maintaining versatility for diverse assays across the array

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a universal parameter management framework that can handle multiple assay types through a common interface and data structure. This universal approach allows different assay types to be managed within a single system architecture, reducing overall complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230377137A1Analysis method
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 QBD QS IP
  • US20230377137A1 patent drawing
  • US20230377137A1 patent drawing
  • US20230377137A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method of analysing assays performed at respective assay sites of an array or microarray that comprises a plurality of assay sites, the method comprising receiving at least one image of the assay sites of the array or microarray; for each of the assay sites, processing the at least one image to determine at least one metric representative of the degree of reaction at that assay site; for each of the assay sites, determining one or more parameters for that assay site, wherein the one or more parameters for at least one of the assay sites of the array or microarray are different from the one or more parameters for at least one other of the assay sites of the array or microarray; and for each of the assay sites, determining an extent of the reaction at that assay site from the at least one metric for that assay site and the one or more parameters for that assay site. Also disclosed is a correspondingly configured computerized analysis system.