Assembly Instruction Feedback for Real-Time Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional assembly-line workflows rely heavily on human monitoring and expertise, leading to high likelihoods of undetected errors being propagated downstream, with limited electronic monitoring and no mechanism to learn from mistakes or provide on-the-fly adjustments to improve product quality.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system with image capture devices and an assembly instruction module that uses machine-learning models to detect errors, evaluate deviations, and automatically adjust assembly instructions in real-time, providing feedback to operators through dynamic visual or other formats to minimize errors and improve product quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human monitoring and expertise are used for error detection, then operational flexibility is maintained, but error detection reliability deteriorates due to human limitations and fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human monitoring and expertise with electronic monitoring systems and machine-learning models. Image capture devices and sensors automatically detect assembly errors, substituting the mechanical human inspection process with electronic detection systems that eliminate human limitations like fatigue and inconsistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-correction by automatically detecting errors and providing real-time feedback to operators through modified instructions. The assembly line system serves itself by using machine-learning models to identify deviations and autonomously adjust downstream processes without requiring human expertise for error detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If human operators are trained for narrow tasks, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates when errors occur upstream

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator task simplicityVSAvoidworkflow adaptation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback loops where machine-learning models continuously monitor assembly processes and automatically modify instructions for downstream operators. When upstream errors are detected, the system provides immediate feedback through modified video instructions or alerts, enabling operators to adapt their actions without requiring deep understanding of upstream processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts assembly instructions based on real-time error detection. Video instructions and operational guidance are modified on-the-fly rather than remaining static, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while operators continue performing their trained tasks with updated guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If conventional electronic monitoring is implemented, then productivity is improved, but error correction capability deteriorates due to lack of real-time adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly line throughputVSAvoiderror correction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary error detection and correction before defects propagate downstream. By using machine-learning models to identify errors early in the assembly process and automatically adjusting instructions in advance, the system prevents error propagation while maintaining continuous production flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback mechanisms allow the system to immediately respond to detected errors by modifying downstream instructions. This closed-loop control enables continuous productivity while simultaneously improving error correction capability, as corrections are implemented during production rather than requiring post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12140926B2Assembly error correction for assembly lines
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 NANOTRONICS IMAGING INC
  • US12140926B2 patent drawing
  • US12140926B2 patent drawing
  • US12140926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosed technology provide a computational model that utilizes machine learning for detecting errors during a manual assembly process and determining a sequence of steps to complete the manual assembly process in order to mitigate the detected errors. In some implementations, the disclosed technology evaluates a target object at a step of an assembly process where an error is detected to a nominal object to obtain a comparison. Based on this comparison, a sequence of steps for completion of the assembly process of the target object is obtained. The assembly instructions for creating the target object are adjusted based on this sequence of steps.