Automatic Quality Control System for Assembly Line Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current assembly line manufacturing processes rely heavily on human skill and experience for quality control, including defect inspection, which is inefficient and prone to errors, as they often require manual analysis of images from high-tech inspection devices like x-ray and acoustic imagers.

Innovation Solution

An automatic quality control system that uses a C-Mode Scanning Acoustic Microscope to obtain images of devices, characterizes features using criteria such as area, roundness, and extent, compares these with benchmark images, and automatically classifies defects in real time, creating a self-learning system that identifies and reports defects dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual analysis of images from inspection devices is used, then human skill and experience can be applied for defect detection, but the process is inefficient and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic quality control that is self-learning and dynamic, identifying and classifying defects in real-time without requiring manual analysis. The processor automatically characterizes features, compares them against benchmarks, and updates knowledge databases, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating dependence on human operators for routine inspection tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of image analysis with an automated electronic system. The processor uses algorithms to characterize features, compare images, and classify defects automatically, substituting human cognitive processes with computational methods that operate faster and without fatigue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If multiple manual inspections are performed, then defect detection thoroughness can be improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection thoroughnessVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs continuous real-time inspection throughout the manufacturing process rather than discrete manual inspections. The automatic quality control operates continuously, characterizing features and detecting defects without interruption, ensuring thorough detection while maintaining high speed and eliminating idle time between inspections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If automated inspection systems are implemented, then inspection speed can be increased, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be universal and adaptable to different manufacturing contexts. The processor can characterize various features using multiple criteria and compare against different benchmarks, making the system versatile for different defect types and manufacturing processes while maintaining a unified automated approach that simplifies overall system integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables real-time, automatic, and accurate defect identification and classification, reducing human error and improving manufacturing efficiency by providing immediate feedback for process corrections and updating knowledge databases for continuous improvement.

Implementation Method 1

obtain a first image of the device using a C-Mode Scanning Acoustic Microscope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic Microscopy: Acoustic Microscopy

Data Source

PatentUS9390491B2System and method for automatic quality control for assembly line processes
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9390491B2 patent drawing
  • US9390491B2 patent drawing
  • US9390491B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method is disclosed for a quality control and/or inspection procedure for assembly line processes. The disclosed system and method enable automatic optical inspection of a device during different stages of manufacture as well as in its finished form. The disclosed system and method enable the automatic quality control process to be self-learning, dynamic, and to identify and classify defects in real time.