Assembly Unit Defect Prediction Through Vector Drift Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current optical inspection methods struggle to predict defects in assembly units efficiently, leading to potential defects in completed units and reduced yield on the assembly line.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves accessing inspection images of assembly units, detecting features, generating multi-dimensional vectors, and grouping these vectors to identify patterns indicative of defects, allowing for real-time prediction and anomaly detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional optical inspection methods are used to detect defects in assembly units, then inspection coverage is achieved, but defect prediction capability is insufficient leading to reduced yield

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prediction capabilityVSAvoidassembly line yield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect prediction by analyzing inspection images and generating multi-dimensional vectors before assembly units complete production. By grouping vectors and identifying patterns indicative of defects early in the process, the system predicts potential defects before they manifest in finished products, enabling preventive measures to be taken and reducing waste of completed units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/optical inspection methods with a data-driven machine learning approach. Instead of relying solely on optical detection of visible defects, the system uses multi-dimensional vector analysis and pattern recognition to predict defects based on subtle feature variations, transforming physical inspection into computational prediction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive inspection of all assembly units is performed, then defect detection accuracy improves, but inspection time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from inspection images to generate multi-dimensional vectors, rather than analyzing entire images comprehensively. By identifying and extracting key predictive features through vector grouping and pattern analysis, the system achieves high defect detection accuracy while reducing processing time and computational resources required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial inspection by focusing computational resources on analyzing specific feature vectors that are most indicative of defects. Rather than uniformly processing all image data from every assembly unit, the system identifies and analyzes only the critical features needed for accurate defect prediction, reducing overall inspection time while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If traditional inspection methods are used, then current production processes are maintained, but manufacturing drifts are not detected until defects appear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process stabilityVSAvoiddefect prevention capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback by analyzing inspection images and vector patterns throughout production, comparing results against learned norms to detect manufacturing drifts. When drifts are detected through vector grouping analysis, the system can alert operators or adjust processes before defects occur, maintaining both process stability and manufacturing precision through real-time monitoring and corrective action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250111498A1Method for predicting defects in assembly units
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 INSTRUMENTAL INC
  • US20250111498A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111498A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111498A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a method for predicting manufacturing defects includes: accessing a first set of inspection images of a first set of assembly units recorded by an optical inspection station over a first period of time; generating a first set of vectors representing features extracted from the first set of inspection images; grouping neighboring vectors in a multi-dimensional feature space into a set of vector groups; accessing a second inspection image of a second assembly recorded by the optical inspection station at a second time succeeding the first period of time; detecting a second set of features in the second inspection image; generating a second vector representing the second set of features in the multi-dimensional feature space; and, in response to the second vector deviating from the set of vector groups by more than a threshold difference, flagging the second assembly unit.