Assessment Paper Generation System Using Reference Attribute Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for generating assessment papers are inefficient, requiring significant human resources and suffering from inconsistency and individual biases, as they lack a standardized method to compare and replicate the quality of assessment papers, leading to fluctuating examination patterns and inadequate coverage of educational syllabi.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyze the attributes of reference assessment questions to generate a template for creating assessment papers, ensuring consistency and quality by selecting questions based on these attributes, and providing a quality scoring mechanism to validate the generated papers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual generation of assessment papers by teachers is used, then the assessment papers can be customized to resemble actual assessment papers, but the process consumes significant time and human resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of reference assessment papers to extract patterns, attributes, and characteristics before generating new assessment papers. This pre-processing enables automated generation that replicates the quality and structure of manually created papers without requiring teachers to spend time on each individual paper creation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of the structural and attribute patterns from reference assessment papers. By analyzing and replicating the characteristics of high-quality manually created papers, the system generates new assessment papers that resemble actual assessment papers while eliminating the need for repeated manual creation efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple teachers create multiple assessment papers, then variety and coverage of syllabus improve, but individual biases and inconsistency in quality occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesyllabus coverageVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system standardizes the parameters and attributes used to create assessment papers by analyzing reference papers and establishing consistent parameter sets. This standardization ensures that all generated papers, regardless of which teacher created the reference material, maintain consistent quality and follow the same structural patterns, eliminating individual biases while preserving syllabus coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal template and attribute framework that can be applied across multiple assessment papers and subjects. This universal approach ensures consistent quality standards are applied to all generated papers while the system can still adapt to cover different syllabus requirements, resolving the conflict between versatility and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If random selection of questions from database is used, then test generation speed increases, but important aspects of syllabus are not covered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest generation speedVSAvoidsyllabus coverage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the analysis of reference assessment papers to guide the selection of questions from the database. By comparing the attributes and patterns of reference papers with available database questions, the system intelligently selects questions that ensure comprehensive syllabus coverage while maintaining the speed of automated generation, avoiding both random selection and slow manual curation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If teacher expertise is used to generate assessment papers, then the papers resemble actual assessment papers, but the work product is inconsistent over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresemblance to actual papersVSAvoidquality consistency over time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a stable copy of the patterns and attributes from reference assessment papers that were originally created by expert teachers. By capturing and replicating these patterns in a standardized framework, the system maintains the quality and resemblance to actual assessment papers consistently over time, eliminating the variability inherent in repeated manual creation by individual teachers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11393354B2System and method for generating an assessment paper and measuring the quality thereof
Publication Date: 2022.07.19 INDIAVIDUAL LEARNING LTD
  • US11393354B2 patent drawing
  • US11393354B2 patent drawing
  • US11393354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and a method for generating a question paper are disclosed. Also disclosed is a method and a system for measuring the quality of a question paper. In one embodiment, the method for generating the question paper comprises, a) analysing reference question paper(s) b) generating a template comprising characteristic(s) for the question paper to be generated, and c) generating the question paper by selecting question(s) from a database so as to match the characteristic(s) of the template. Further, the characteristics of any given question paper or the generated question paper are compared with the characteristics in the generated template to determine a quality score. A system for implementing the disclosed methods is also disclosed. Further, a method for measuring effectiveness of a quality score and a method for interpreting a determined quality score is disclosed.