Asset Allocator Control for Automated Central Plant Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for formulating mathematical models to optimize the operation of central plants are manual and time-consuming, making it challenging to efficiently allocate energy loads across assets in central energy facilities.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for formulating economic model predictive control (EMPC) problems using an asset allocator that receives a physical layout model of the central plant, identifies interconnected systems, discovers cycles, and groups equipment to optimize resource allocation and minimize operational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual methods are used to formulate mathematical models for EMPC optimization, then the formulation process can be completed with simple tools, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of formulationVSAvoidformulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically formulates EMPC mathematical models by receiving plant layout data and autonomously generating optimization formulations, eliminating the need for manual model creation by engineers while significantly reducing formulation time and effort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of model formulation with an automated computational system that uses algorithms to generate mathematical models, transitioning from human-driven manual work to machine-driven automatic generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated formulation methods are implemented, then formulation time is reduced and productivity increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated formulation system serves multiple functions including receiving plant layout data, automatically generating mathematical models, and outputting optimization formulations, making it a universal tool that handles the entire model formulation process without requiring separate manual steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated formulation engine as an intermediary between plant layout data and EMPC optimization requirements, translating physical plant configurations into mathematical optimization models through algorithmic processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If manual model formulation is used, then system complexity remains low, but the ability to optimally allocate energy loads across assets is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation complexityVSAvoidload allocation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system independently analyzes plant layouts and generates appropriate mathematical models tailored to specific plant configurations, enabling the system to adapt to various energy allocation scenarios without requiring manual reconfiguration or simplification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11914353B2Control system with automatic optimization formulation
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • US11914353B2 patent drawing
  • US11914353B2 patent drawing
  • US11914353B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system configured to serve one or more energy loads in a building comprises equipment configured to consume, produce, or store one or more resources including electricity, water, natural gas, steam, hot thermal energy, cold thermal energy, or electrical energy. The control system includes an asset allocator configured to receive an input model that describes a physical layout of the equipment and create a net list that defines connections between the equipment using the input model. The asset allocator is configured to discover one or more systems of interconnected equipment and one or more groups of equipment using the net list, formulate an optimization problem using the systems and groups of equipment, and operate the equipment according to the optimization problem.