Asset Digital Twin for Transient Response Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing the compliance of power generation assets with grid regulations during disruptive events are inadequate, as they often rely on deceptive field tests or offline simulations, which do not accurately reflect real-world conditions, making it difficult to determine the actual transient response capability and compliance with high confidence.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates a model of a target asset based on physical operation data during a defined event, simulating its transient response capability and determining compliance with defined parameters, using a combination of physics-based and data-driven models, and leveraging historical data from similar assets to improve accuracy and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If deceptive field tests or offline simulations are used to test asset compliance, then testing can be performed, but the accuracy and reliability of compliance determination deteriorates because they do not accurately reflect real-world conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance determination accuracyVSAvoidconfidence in compliance assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (virtual model) of the physical asset that replicates its transient response characteristics. This virtual model is then used to simulate disruptive events and assess compliance without affecting the actual asset. The digital twin accurately copies the asset's behavior under various conditions, enabling reliable compliance determination while avoiding the limitations of deceptive field tests and offline simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary characterization of the asset's transient response capability by collecting and analyzing operational data before actual disruptive events occur. This pre-established knowledge base allows for accurate compliance assessment during real events without needing to perform deceptive tests that compromise reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional testing methods are used, then some compliance assessment can be obtained, but the confidence level in the assessment deteriorates due to inability to accurately reflect real-world transient response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence in compliance assessmentVSAvoidtransient response capability measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects operational data from the asset during normal operation and uses this feedback to refine and update the digital twin model. This ongoing calibration ensures that the virtual model accurately reflects the actual asset's transient response characteristics, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining high confidence in compliance assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical testing mechanisms (deceptive field tests) with computational modeling and data analysis. By substituting mechanical/physical test methods with digital simulation and machine learning-based characterization, the system achieves both high reliability and precision in assessing transient response capability without the drawbacks of traditional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If no formal testing is performed, then asset operation continues without disruption, but the ability to determine compliance with grid regulations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset operational continuityVSAvoidcompliance measurement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The asset essentially performs its own compliance assessment through the digital twin system that utilizes its own operational data. The system continuously monitors and characterizes the asset's transient response using real-world operating conditions, eliminating the need for separate formal testing that would disrupt asset operation while maintaining precise compliance measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous compliance assessment by utilizing operational data collected during normal asset operation. Rather than requiring periodic formal tests that interrupt productivity, the digital twin continuously evaluates compliance based on ongoing operational data, maintaining both asset productivity and measurement precision simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10922634B2Determining compliance of a target asset to at least one defined parameter based on a simulated transient response capability of the target asset and as a function of physical operation data measured during an actual defined event
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US10922634B2 patent drawing
  • US10922634B2 patent drawing
  • US10922634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Distribution network response capability monitoring and compliance determination is provided herein. A method can comprise generating, by a system comprising a processor, a model of a target asset based on operation data measured at the target asset during a defined event. The model is configured to simulate a transient response capability of the target asset. The method can also comprise determining, by the system, a compliance of the target asset to at least one defined parameter based on the transient response capability of the target asset during a simulated event and as a function of the operation data measured during the defined event.