Electrical Asset Failure Probability Monitoring for Targeted Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical asset maintenance systems lack precision in predicting failure, leading to unexpected outages and unplanned repairs, which can cause downtime and damage to equipment.

Innovation Solution

A monitoring system that calculates the probability of failure (PoF) of electrical assets based on health indices, identifies contributing parameters and sub-parameters, and schedules targeted maintenance to reduce unexpected failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional maintenance scheduling is used, then maintenance activities can be planned, but failure prediction precision is insufficient leading to unexpected outages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction precisionVSAvoidunexpected outage rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of electrical asset health by calculating health indices and probability of failure values before actual failures occur. This enables proactive maintenance scheduling based on predicted failure risks rather than reactive repairs, thereby improving failure prediction precision and reducing unexpected outages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors electrical asset performance parameters and updates health indices based on actual performance data. This feedback loop enables dynamic adjustment of failure probability assessments, improving prediction accuracy over time as the system learns from actual asset behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive monitoring of all parameters is implemented, then failure prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring task by prioritizing parameters based on their contribution to failure probability. Instead of equally monitoring all parameters, the system identifies and focuses on critical parameters that have the highest impact on failure prediction, thereby achieving accurate predictions with reduced monitoring complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the weight and monitoring intensity of different parameters based on their calculated contribution to failure probability. Parameters with higher contribution weights receive more attention and monitoring resources, while less critical parameters are monitored less intensely, optimizing the balance between prediction accuracy and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If maintenance is scheduled based on fixed intervals, then maintenance planning is simple, but resource allocation efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidmaintenance planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces fixed-interval maintenance scheduling with dynamic, condition-based scheduling. Maintenance timing is adjusted continuously based on real-time health indices and probability of failure calculations, allowing resources to be allocated more efficiently to assets that actually need maintenance most urgently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies differentiated maintenance strategies to different electrical assets based on their individual failure probabilities and health conditions. Instead of uniform maintenance scheduling, each asset receives tailored maintenance planning proportional to its risk level, optimizing resource allocation efficiency while maintaining manageable planning complexity through automated prioritization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260003012A1Electrical asset maintenance based on probability of failure
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US20260003012A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003012A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003012A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A monitoring system including: a connection interface configured to couple to an electrical asset; and a probability of failure module configured to: access a health index of the electrical asset; determine a probability of failure of the electrical asset based on the health index of the electrical asset; access scores, the scores including a score for each of at least two parameters associated with the electrical asset; determine a probability of failure of the at least two parameters associated with the electrical asset based on the scores; and determine a contribution of the at least two parameters to the probability of failure of the electrical asset based on the probability of failure of the at least two parameters.