Autonomous Asset Tracking With Lifecycle Valuation Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems lack effective methods for tracking and managing the lifecycle of assets to determine optimal replacement times, leading to inefficiencies in eco-friendly upgrades and inaccurate insurance claims, while also failing to consider environmental and health impacts.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising communications, logic, and interface circuits that aggregate asset usage data, apply lifecycle profiles, and execute algorithms to generate valuation scores, providing feedback on optimal replacement times and environmental impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing systems track asset lifecycles manually or with basic methods, then implementation complexity is low, but tracking accuracy and reliability are insufficient leading to inefficient replacement decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset lifecycle tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments asset tracking by creating individual lifecycle profiles for each asset type (electrical, mechanical, electronic) with specific parameters and algorithms tailored to that asset class. This allows accurate tracking without requiring a monolithic complex system, as each segment can be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that collects data from diverse asset sources, normalizes it according to standardized profiles, and feeds it to algorithmic evaluation systems. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall architecture by abstracting the complexity of data collection and processing from the core decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive asset monitoring is implemented to improve replacement decisions, then decision accuracy improves, but cost and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement decision accuracyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring monitoring parameters and algorithms to specific asset types and their unique lifecycle characteristics. Rather than uniformly monitoring all assets with the same intensity, the system adjusts the quality and depth of monitoring based on asset-specific profiles, optimizing resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters based on asset age, condition, and lifecycle stage. The system changes parameters such as data collection frequency, algorithm selection, and evaluation thresholds adaptively, reducing resource consumption during stable periods while increasing intensity when replacement decisions are imminent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If basic asset tracking is used, then system cost is low, but environmental and health impact assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental and health impact assessmentVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a multi-functional platform that simultaneously performs asset lifecycle tracking, replacement optimization, and environmental/health impact assessment. The same core infrastructure (data collection, processing, algorithm execution) serves multiple purposes, reducing the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor environmental and health parameters associated with asset operation, compare them against predefined thresholds and lifecycle expectations, and adjust monitoring intensity and assessment algorithms accordingly. This enables comprehensive impact assessment while adapting to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If manual asset record keeping is used, then implementation is simple, but accuracy of property records and depreciation information is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty record accuracyVSAvoidrecord keeping complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by having assets automatically report their own status, usage, and condition data through integrated sensors and communication interfaces. The system autonomously collects, validates, and updates asset records without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving accuracy while reducing operational burden through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical record-keeping processes with digital automated systems that electronically track asset lifecycles, generate depreciation schedules, and maintain property records. This substitution of mechanical manual processes with automated digital systems eliminates human error while simplifying operation through centralized digital access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250356322A1Autonomous tracking of disparate assets
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
  • US20250356322A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356322A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356322A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One exemplary aspect concerns a system that includes a communications circuit, logic circuitry and an interface circuit working together to aggregate and provide feedback on indications of ongoing use of various assets such as in use in and around a residence. For each asset, the communications circuit and logic circuitry are used to receive and aggregate ongoing-use indications, access a profile indicating an asset-related lifecycle, and in response execute an algorithm to adjust a valuation score of the asset. The interface circuit may report on the ongoing use of said at least one of the plurality of disparate assets. In a more specific example, the valuation score is associated with one or more environmental-related components that appreciate and/or depreciate with ongoing use of the asset over portions of the lifecycle, and the assets may be residence-related such as including solar panels, IoTs, battery-assisted vehicles, and HVAC appliances.