Failure Mode Classification from Asset Notification Text

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in analyzing historical data from physical assets to identify failure modes effectively, as valuable information is often buried within millions of lines of text, making it difficult to determine the frequency of failures and identify equipment with higher failure occurrences.

Innovation Solution

A system for failure mode analytics that uses machine learning to extract topics from historical notification data, map them to predefined failure modes, and validate the model through user interface validation, enabling supervised learning for predictive failure mode assignments and calculation of MTTF, MTTR, and MTBF metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual analysis of historical notification data is performed, then detailed examination of each notification is possible, but the analysis becomes extremely time-consuming and inefficient when dealing with millions of lines of text

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical analysis with automated text mining and machine learning algorithms. The system automatically extracts topics from notification texts, maps them to failure modes, and generates analytics without human intervention, resolving the contradiction between analysis accuracy and time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer consisting of topic extraction algorithms and failure mode mapping mechanisms. This intermediary automatically processes the raw notification data, transforming it into structured analytics that can be analyzed efficiently, thereby reducing both time and manual effort while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive historical data is collected from multiple sources, then more complete failure mode information is obtained, but data integration and processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal processing framework that handles multiple data sources (notifications, work orders, logs) through a single integrated system. The text mining engine and failure mode mapping mechanism work uniformly across all data types, reducing system complexity while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex data processing task into distinct modular components: topic extraction module, failure mode mapping module, and analytics generation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the data, making the overall system more manageable and less complex while processing comprehensive data from multiple sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated text processing is implemented, then analysis speed increases, but the ability to accurately understand contextual nuances in notification texts may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcontext understanding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses advanced natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to replace simple automated text processing. These algorithms maintain contextual understanding by learning from training data while processing texts at high speed, resolving the contradiction between processing speed and contextual accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously refines its topic extraction and failure mode mapping based on processed data patterns. This feedback loop allows the automated system to improve its contextual understanding over time while maintaining high processing speeds through optimized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11567460B2Failure mode analytics
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 SAP SE
  • US11567460B2 patent drawing
  • US11567460B2 patent drawing
  • US11567460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system and method for training and validating models in a machine learning pipeline for failure mode analytics. The machine learning pipeline may include an unsupervised training phase, a validation phase and a supervised training and scoring phase. In one example, the method may include receiving a request to create a machine learning model for failure mode detection associated with an asset, retrieving historical notification data of the asset, generating an unsupervised machine learning model via unsupervised learning on the historical notification data, wherein the unsupervised learning comprises identifying failure topics from text included in the historical notification data and mapping the identified failure topics to a plurality of predefined failure modes for the asset, and storing the generated unsupervised machine learning model via a storage device.