Distribution Network Asset Placement for Voltage and Reactive Power Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in electrical power distribution systems is the optimal placement and sizing of multiple distributed energy resources (DERs) to ensure robust operation, particularly with increasing renewable generation sources and electric vehicle chargers, which often results in sub-optimal voltage profiles and increased reactive power circulation, necessitating larger investments and inefficient asset management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a placement generation engine, power flow optimization engine, and simulation engine to determine optimal placement and sizing of assets in a distribution network, considering asset-installation constraints, and iteratively adjusting parameters to achieve robust operation across varying load and generation scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple distributed energy resources are added to meet increasing load requirements, then the energy supply capability is improved, but voltage regulation deteriorates and reactive power circulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of DERsVSAvoidvoltage regulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing optimal control parameters for controllers (such as DVRs, D-STATCOMs, and OLTC) before actual power flow conditions occur. The offline power flow optimization engine computes control settings for various scenarios in advance, and these pre-computed parameters are then quickly retrieved and applied during real-time operation, enabling rapid response to voltage regulation needs without complex real-time calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary devices such as Dynamic Voltage Restorers (DVRs), Distributed STATCOMs (D-STATCOMs), and On-Load Tap Changers (OLTCs) that act as mediators between the DERs and the distribution network. These intermediary controllers actively regulate voltage and manage reactive power flow, isolating the negative effects of DER integration from the grid while maintaining stable voltage profiles even with high DER penetration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional sequential asset placement methods are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but optimization effectiveness deteriorates due to inability to handle multiple assets simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidoptimization effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex optimization problem into two distinct parts: an offline power flow optimization phase that handles comprehensive multi-asset placement calculations, and an online control execution phase that implements the pre-determined solutions. This segmentation allows the computationally intensive optimization to be performed once offline, while runtime operations remain simple and efficient, effectively dividing the complexity management between planning and execution stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary optimization calculations offline before actual asset deployment and operation. The offline power flow optimization engine pre-computes optimal asset placements, sizes, and control parameters for multiple scenarios, storing these results for rapid retrieval during operation. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time optimization, maintaining implementation simplicity while achieving high optimization effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If assets are placed without optimal sizing and placement, then deployment speed is maintained, but investment efficiency deteriorates due to sub-optimal voltage profiles and increased reactive power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidreactive power circulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of asset sizing and placement offline before deployment, using power flow optimization to determine the optimal configuration that minimizes reactive power circulation and voltage deviations. By pre-calculating these optimal parameters, the system achieves both rapid deployment (since assets are pre-configured) and high investment efficiency (since the placement is optimized), eliminating the trade-off between speed and effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously including asset placement locations, asset sizes, and controller settings through the offline power flow optimization engine. This comprehensive parameter optimization ensures that assets are not only placed quickly but also configured to operate at optimal points, minimizing reactive power circulation and maximizing investment efficiency across all controlled variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240232472A1Multi-asset placement and sizing for robust operation of distribution systems
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 SIEMENS CORP
  • US20240232472A1 patent drawing
  • US20240232472A1 patent drawing
  • US20240232472A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for adding assets to a distribution network includes using a placement generation engine to generate discrete placements of assets to be added to the distribution network subject to asset-installation constraint(s). Each placement is defined by a mapping of an asset, from multiple assets of different sizes, to a placement location defined by a node or branch of the distribution network. Each placement is used to update an operational circuit model of the distribution network for tuning control parameters of one or more controllers of the distribution network for robust operation over a range of load and/or generation scenarios. A cost function is evaluated for each placement based on a simulated operation. Parameters of the placement generation engine are iteratively adjusted based on the evaluated cost functions to arrive at an optimal placement and sizing of assets to be added to the distribution network.