Asset Tracking Device False Alarm Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Asset tracking systems often generate false alarms when an asset is intentionally removed from a predetermined safe zone for legitimate reasons, causing confusion and unnecessary notifications.

Innovation Solution

Equipping tracking devices with sensors and user input mechanisms, such as buttons or Bluetooth proximity detection, to differentiate between intentional and unintentional breaches, allowing users to suppress alerts during anticipated excursions and resetting the system accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system generates alerts for every breach of the safe zone, then the reliability of asset tracking is improved, but the quantity of false alarms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset tracking reliabilityVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting a breach event and initiating a suppression mechanism before generating an alert. When a breach is detected, the system checks whether suppression should be applied and prevents the alert from being generated, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliable tracking and false alarm reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring breach events and dynamically controlling alert generation based on detected patterns. The system receives feedback from breach detections and adjusts its behavior by suppressing alerts when appropriate, maintaining reliability while reducing false alarms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple people are notified of breaches, then the likelihood of asset recovery is improved, but the quantity of notifications increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset recovery likelihoodVSAvoidnotification quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts false alarm notifications from the overall notification stream by identifying and suppressing alerts that would result from legitimate temporary breaches. This allows genuine security concerns to be communicated to multiple people while eliminating unnecessary notifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors asset location continuously, then the measurement precision of asset position is improved, but the use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset position precisionVSAvoidtracking device energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by monitoring asset location at regular intervals rather than continuously. The breach detection mechanism checks position periodically to determine if the asset has left the safe zone, maintaining adequate measurement precision while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP2740112B1Reduction of false alarms in asset tracking
Publication Date: 2019.06.19 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP2740112B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2740112B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2740112B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An asset tracking device and methods prevent false alarms when a tracked asset is intentionally removed from a safe zone. A special mode is enabled on the tracking device or a server by a user. In response, the asset tracking device or server may start a first timer providing time for the asset to leave the safe zone. The asset tracking device or server monitors for the device leaving the safe zone. If the asset does not leave the safe zone within this predefined period of time, the tracking device or server resets to its normal operating mode. If the asset is removed within the first time period, a second timer may be set for a maximum duration that the asset will be outside the safe zone. If the asset is not returned to the safe zone within the second time period, the asset or server may send an alarm.