Pivotal Assist Grip Hook Assembly with Integrated Pivot Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing assist grip assemblies in vehicles often require complex mechanisms with numerous components, leading to misalignments and increased assembly time due to excessive rotation of articulating hooks without hard stops.

Innovation Solution

A pivot-control mechanism that includes a mating shaft and receiving cavity with flex retainers, allowing dependent and independent rotation of the user handle and object hook, with positive stops to prevent over-travel and misalignment, simplifying assembly and reducing component count.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a complex mechanism with numerous components is used for the articulating hook, then the hook can rotate freely, but the assembly time increases and misalignments occur due to excessive rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehook rotation freedomVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanism is divided into distinct functional segments: the pivot control mechanism with shaft and cavity handles dependent rotation, while the flex retainer with pivot stops manages independent rotation limits. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently, reducing overall assembly complexity and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot control mechanism changes the rotational parameter from completely free (complex mechanism) to controlled (dependent and independent rotation with stops). By modifying the rotation parameter through the shaft-cavity-retainer interaction, the system achieves the needed adaptability without requiring numerous additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If a complex mechanism with numerous components is used for the articulating hook, then the hook can rotate freely, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehook rotation freedomVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into a single integrated pivot control mechanism. The shaft, receiving cavity, and flex retainer work together as one unified system that provides both dependent and independent rotation control, eliminating the need for separate springs, C-clamps, styling caps, and secondary pins that would increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot control mechanism serves multiple functions simultaneously: it enables the hook to rotate with the user handle, allows independent hook rotation for positioning, and provides hard stops to prevent over-rotation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components, thereby reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the hook is permitted to rotate 180° without a hard stop, then the rotation range is maximized, but misalignments in the vehicle occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation rangeVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pivot stops on the flex retainer preliminarily prevent the harmful effect of over-rotation by establishing hard stops before misalignment can occur. This preliminary anti-action ensures the hook rotates within the safe range while maintaining alignment precision, without restricting the necessary rotation for functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If additional components such as extra springs, C-clamps, and secondary pins are used, then the articulating hook mechanism is more robust, but the assembly process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism robustnessVSAvoidassembly simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The unnecessary additional components (extra springs, C-clamps, styling caps, secondary pins) are extracted and removed from the design. The remaining essential elements (shaft, receiving cavity, flex retainer with pivot stops) form a simplified mechanism that maintains robustness through proper design rather than through the quantity of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3929030B1Assist grip assembly including a pivotal object hook
Publication Date: 2023.08.16 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP3929030B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3929030B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3929030B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Assist grip assembly (100) includes a user handle (102) and an object hook (104) movably coupled to each other. The object hook and the user handle may be movably coupled to one another through a pivot-control mechanism. The user handle and the object hook are capable of moving together and capable of moving independently with respect to one another.