Assistance Detection Using Acceleration and Vital Parameter Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions fail to reliably and efficiently provide timely assistance to individuals in distress, especially in situations where they cannot access a mobile phone or are in remote areas, as they lack accurate detection of the need for assistance beyond mere acceleration measurements.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and device that measures acceleration and vital parameters, such as gait frequency, to determine if a user needs assistance, signaling help if the measured parameters deviate significantly from pre-defined thresholds, and optionally receiving data from wearable devices to enhance accuracy and reduce false alarms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If only acceleration measurement is used to detect distress, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of assistance detection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of assistance detectionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensing capabilities (acceleration sensor, gait analysis, and vital parameter sensors) into an integrated assistance detection system. By merging these different measurement approaches, the system achieves more reliable detection of distress situations while sharing the device complexity across multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The user device is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as both a mobile phone for direct communication and as an autonomous assistance detection device when the user is incapacitated. This multi-functionality allows the same hardware to provide reliable assistance detection without requiring a separate dedicated device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple vital parameter measurements are performed continuously, then the reliability of distress detection is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of distress detectionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the system uses periodic measurement triggered by acceleration events. Vital parameters are measured at specific intervals following an acceleration threshold breach, allowing the system to maintain detection reliability while significantly reducing overall energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary acceleration monitoring continuously at low power, and only initiates the more energy-intensive vital parameter measurements when an acceleration event suggests potential distress. This preliminary screening approach maintains accuracy while minimizing energy usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If acceleration threshold is set low to detect all potential incidents, then the detection sensitivity is high, but the number of false alarms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from gait analysis to verify whether an acceleration event represents a genuine distress situation. After detecting an acceleration threshold breach, the system analyzes subsequent gait patterns to confirm distress, providing a feedback mechanism that reduces false alarms while maintaining high detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Gait analysis serves as an intermediary verification step between the initial acceleration detection and the final assistance alarm. This intermediate check filters out false positives from normal activities while allowing genuine distress events to proceed to alarm generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively detects the need for assistance by combining acceleration and vital parameter measurements, reducing false alarms and ensuring timely support for users in distress, even in remote or hazardous situations.

Implementation Method 1

An acceleration measurement of the user is provided by an acceleration sensor of the user device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The vital parameter of the user is a gait of the user, wherein the gait of the user is determined by determining periodical accelerations caused by the gait of the user

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGait detection through periodical acceleration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP3545824B1Method for supporting a user and user device
Publication Date: 2022.07.20 SONY GROUP CORP
  • EP3545824B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3545824B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure proposes a method for supporting a user. The method contains providing an acceleration measurement of the user and measuring at least one vital parameter of the user if the acceleration measurement is above a predefined acceleration threshold. A need of assistance for the user is signaled if the measured vital parameter of the user deviates from a standard vital parameter of the user by more than a predefined threshold.