Digital Assistant Error Feedback Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital assistants often fail to provide optimal responses to user requests due to errors in processing, leading to inefficient and frustrating user experiences, as users may need to repeat or rephrase requests, modify operations, or use different services to achieve the same task.

Innovation Solution

The method involves collecting and processing data on interactions between users and digital assistants to identify and analyze errors, allowing for the updating of digital assistant components to improve performance, which includes obtaining data on user interactions, processing it to determine errors, and transmitting relevant feedback to a remote device for further analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the digital assistant processes user requests automatically, then productivity is improved, but errors occur leading to reduced reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing efficiencyVSAvoidresponse accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the digital assistant monitors user interactions, detects errors in request processing, and uses this information to improve future responses. The system collects feedback data from user corrections and rephrased requests to refine its processing accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The digital assistant performs self-diagnosis and self-improvement by analyzing its own processing errors and user feedback. The system automatically identifies patterns in failed requests and adjusts its processing logic without requiring manual retraining, enabling continuous autonomous improvement of reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the digital assistant collects and analyzes interaction data to improve performance, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates specific feedback data elements from the complex interaction logs, focusing only on the relevant information needed for error analysis. By separating and extracting only the necessary data components (such as user corrections and rephrased requests), the system reduces processing complexity while maintaining improvement effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The data processing system is segmented into distinct functional modules that handle different aspects of feedback analysis independently. This modular approach allows each component to process specific data types separately, reducing overall system complexity and enabling more manageable error analysis and learning processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If the digital assistant repeats the same errors in future requests, then productivity is maintained, but user experience deteriorates due to frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest processing speedVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors user interactions and collects feedback data that indicates when the same errors recur. This feedback mechanism enables the digital assistant to learn from repeated failures and adjust its processing to avoid reproducing the same mistakes, thereby improving user experience while maintaining efficient request handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The digital assistant performs preliminary analysis of user requests and potential processing pitfalls before executing the full processing sequence. By anticipating possible errors based on patterns in feedback data, the system can take preliminary corrective actions to prevent errors from occurring in the first place, improving both user experience and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11301477B2Feedback analysis of a digital assistant
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 APPLE INC
  • US11301477B2 patent drawing
  • US11301477B2 patent drawing
  • US11301477B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and processes for operating an intelligent automated assistant are provided. In accordance with one example, a method includes, at an electronic device with one or more processors and memory, obtaining a first set of data corresponding to one or more interactions between a user and the digital assistant on the electronic device; obtaining a second set of data corresponding to one or more interactions between the user and an application on the electronic device; and storing the first set of data and the second set of data. The method further includes receiving a set of executable instructions; processing, based on the received set of executable instructions, the first set of data and the second set of data to obtain a third set of data; and transmitting the third set of data to a remote electronic device.