Automotive Assistant Sightline Filtering for Intent-Aware Speech

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern automotive assistants face ambiguity in determining whether an utterance is directed at them, especially in multi-occupant scenarios, leading to potential misinterpretation and unnecessary responses.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a speech filter that uses sightline detection to determine if an occupant's gaze intersects a designated ocular zone, thereby deciding whether to disregard or respond to an utterance, incorporating a sightline detector and logic circuit to assess the probability of the utterance being addressed to the assistant.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the automotive assistant responds to all utterances without wake word activation, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability deteriorates due to misinterpretation of utterances not directed at the assistant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an ocular zone as an intermediary spatial parameter between the occupant and the automotive assistant. The sightline detection system acts as a mediator that determines whether the occupant is directing their attention to the assistant before processing utterances. This intermediary mechanism resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of operation (no wake word needed) while improving reliability (filtering out unintended utterances through sightline verification).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the automotive assistant uses sightline detection to determine intent, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by utilizing existing vehicle cameras for multiple purposes: their primary function for monitoring and the secondary function for sightline detection. The ocular zone is defined as a virtual parameter in existing camera coordinate systems, allowing the same hardware to perform both traditional vision tasks and new intent-detection tasks without adding dedicated sensors, thus improving reliability while minimizing increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the automotive assistant defines a fixed ocular zone for each occupant, then the ease of operation is improved, but the adaptability deteriorates when occupant positions or orientations change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the ocular zone a movable and adjustable parameter rather than a fixed definition. The ocular zone can be dynamically repositioned based on detected occupant location, orientation, and head pose. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain ease of operation while improving adaptability to changing occupant positions and orientations throughout the vehicle cabin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240428789A1Selective Disregard of Speech by an Automotive Assistant
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 CERENCE OPERATING CO
  • US20240428789A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428789A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428789A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising causing an automotive assistant in a vehicle to disregard an utterance made by an occupant of that vehicle based on a sightline of the occupant.