Assistant Task Offloading Using Processing Rate Under Hardware Disparities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems rely solely on signal strength metrics for determining whether to offload assistant-related processing tasks, leading to inefficiencies and processing delays due to disparities in network hardware, particularly in vehicles with different antenna capabilities compared to cellular phones.

Innovation Solution

Implementing network metrics such as processing rate and data reception rate from the server computing device to determine whether to offload tasks, allowing for local processing when connection status is poor, thereby reducing latency and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If signal strength metrics are used to determine whether to offload processing tasks, then the decision-making process is simple and fast, but the accuracy of the decision is poor due to hardware disparities between different devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making complexityVSAvoidconnection status accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for connection status determination from signal strength to processing rate. Instead of relying on the antenna's signal strength metric, the system measures the actual processing rate of data packets between the client device and server, which provides a more accurate indication of effective connection status regardless of hardware differences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If server processing is used for all tasks, then processing accuracy is high, but network resource usage increases and latency occurs when connection is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidnetwork resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic task offloading decisions based on real-time processing rate measurements. The system continuously monitors the processing rate and adjusts whether to use server or local processing accordingly, making the processing architecture flexible and adaptive to current network conditions rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from processing rate measurements to inform subsequent offloading decisions. By measuring the actual data processing rate and comparing it against thresholds, the system receives feedback about connection quality and adjusts its processing strategy accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If local processing is used, then network resource usage is reduced, but processing capability is limited compared to server processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resource usageVSAvoidprocessing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables dynamic switching between local and server processing based on measured processing rates. When processing rates indicate good connection status, the system utilizes server processing for enhanced capability; when rates indicate poor connection, it switches to local processing to conserve network resources, optimizing the trade-off dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If threshold signal strength is used to determine connection suitability, then the decision rule is simple, but processing delays occur when hardware disparities exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision rule simplicityVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from signal strength to processing rate, which provides a more accurate reflection of actual connection performance. This parameter change maintains decision rule simplicity while eliminating the processing delays caused by hardware disparities, as processing rate directly measures effective data transmission capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4216210B1Compensating for hardware disparities when determining whether to offload assistant-related processing tasks from certain client devices
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP4216210B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4216210B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP4216210B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

Implementations set forth herein relate to off-loading, or temporarily ceasing such off-loading, computational tasks to a separate computing device based on a network metric(s) that is not limited to signal strength. Rather, a network metric for determining whether to continue relying on a network connection with a server computing device for certain computational tasks can be based on a current, or recent, interaction with the server computing device. In this way, an application executing at a computing device having a powerful antenna - but an otherwise limited network velocity, can determine to temporarily rely exclusively on local processing. For instance, an automated assistant can temporarily cease communicating audio data to a remote server computing device, during a dialog session, in response to determining a network metric fails to satisfy a threshold - even though there may appear to be adequate signal strength to effectively transmit the audio data.