Assistant Utterance Fusion for Correcting Misheard Voice Queries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing speech recognition systems often misinterpret repeated user queries due to accent, dialect, and background noise, failing to utilize the context of multiple utterances and lacking acoustic similarity determination, leading to inaccurate transcription and user frustration.

Innovation Solution

Jointly process multiple spoken utterances within a threshold duration to determine acoustic similarity, using machine learning models to average or weight probabilities, and retroactively correct previous misinterpretations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional speech recognition systems process each utterance independently, then the system structure remains simple, but speech recognition accuracy deteriorates due to inability to utilize contextual information from repeated queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent utterance processing operations into a unified joint processing framework. The system combines acoustic features, spectral mappings, and machine learning model outputs from multiple utterances to determine a single accurate interpretation, rather than treating each utterance as an independent task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the output of one utterance processing operation to inform subsequent processing. When a first utterance is misinterpreted, the system uses the user's corrective second utterance as feedback to retroactively correct the previous misinterpretation and improve future recognition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the system processes multiple repeated utterances separately, then computational resources are reduced, but transcription accuracy deteriorates due to overlooking semantic relationships between repeated queries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranscription accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial processing by selectively joint-processing only certain utterances that meet specific criteria (acoustic similarity, temporal proximity, semantic relationship) rather than all utterances. This avoids excessive computational action while still capturing the necessary contextual information for improved accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary filtering and analysis to identify candidate utterances for joint processing before executing the full joint processing algorithm. This includes preliminary acoustic similarity determination and temporal proximity checking to pre-select which utterances warrant combined processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If the system does not determine acoustic similarity between utterances, then the processing method remains simple, but the ability to identify repeated commands and improve accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand interpretation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical or rule-based speech recognition methods with machine learning-based acoustic similarity determination. The system uses trained models to compare spectral mappings and acoustic features, substituting complex computational mechanisms for simpler but less accurate traditional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If the system treats repeated queries as independent tasks, then processing speed is maintained, but user experience deteriorates due to failure to recognize and correct misinterpretations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experience reliabilityVSAvoidinteraction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuity by keeping contextual information from previous utterances active and available for subsequent processing. Rather than resetting the processing state for each new utterance, the system continuously accumulates and utilizes contextual information to maintain accurate interpretation across the interaction sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12537001B2Joint processing of corrective and misinterpreted utterances for accurate assistant responses
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12537001B2 patent drawing
  • US12537001B2 patent drawing
  • US12537001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations set forth herein relate to an automated assistant that can jointly process spoken utterances that can include at least one corrective utterance and one utterance that may have been misinterpreted by the automated assistant. In this way, the automated assistant does not need to exclusively rely on the corrective utterance to determine a request of a user but, rather, can utilize data capturing any prior spoken utterance to more accurately determine the request. The automated assistant can process utterances jointly after determining that they are acoustically similar and/or received within a threshold duration of time. The joint processing can involve generating a single input, or multiple inputs, to characterize the series of utterances and processing the single input, or multiple inputs, with one or more neural network models and/or machine learning models. The automated assistant can then proactively correct any previous responses to misinterpreted utterances.