Assistive Steering Grip With Dorsal Selector for Limited Hand Function

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals with spinal cord injuries or limited hand function face challenges in controlling a vehicle's steering wheel and secondary controls with one hand, leading to discomfort and inefficiency due to inconvenient grip and button placement in existing assistive driving devices, which are not suitable for those with full arm and hand paralysis.

Innovation Solution

An assistive driving device featuring a base with three posts for securing the hand and arm, a rotatable selector actuable by the dorsum of the hand, and a controller that sends signals to the vehicle's electronic control unit for controlling primary and secondary functions, allowing users to maintain grip on the steering wheel while activating controls without fine motor skills.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional spinner knobs with secondary controls are used, then patients can control vehicle functions with one hand, but the grip is inconvenient and causes wrist strain and discomfort during prolonged operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand control capabilityVSAvoidwrist strain and discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device divides the control functions into two separate components: a spinner knob for steering control and a separate secondary control mechanism with buttons positioned on the rim. This segmentation allows the patient to operate steering and secondary controls independently without compromising wrist position or causing strain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism—a secondary control unit with buttons arranged on the spinner knob rim—that mediates between the patient's limited hand function and the vehicle's multiple control requirements. This intermediary allows one-handed operation of both steering and secondary controls without direct wrist strain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If secondary controls are integrated into the spinner knob, then patients can access multiple functions with one hand, but button placement requires the patient to release or let go of the wheel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol function accessibilityVSAvoidcontinuous wheel grip
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the secondary control buttons directly onto the rim of the spinner knob, combining steering control and secondary function control into a single integrated unit. This allows patients to access multiple vehicle functions without releasing the wheel, as buttons are positioned within easy reach on the knob's circumference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The spinner knob is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a steering control mechanism and as a platform for secondary controls. The buttons on the rim enable control of lights, wipers, and other vehicle functions, making the single device universal for multiple control tasks without requiring hand release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If alternate grip styles are used to solve wrist strain issues, then comfort is improved, but the device becomes inappropriate for patients without full hand and arm control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewrist strainVSAvoidapplicability to different injury levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed with universal adaptability for patients with varying levels of hand and arm function. The spinner knob accommodates different grip styles and can be operated with minimal hand movement, while the secondary controls are positioned to be accessible with limited dexterity. This multi-functional design makes it suitable for patients with different spinal cord injury levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by making the button positions and spinner knob characteristics adjustable or modifiable to suit different patient needs. The secondary controls can be positioned at various locations on the rim, and the spinner knob size and grip features can be changed to accommodate different hand sizes and control capabilities, thereby reducing wrist strain while maintaining accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11789483B2Adaptive driving device
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 OHIO STATE INNOVATION FOUND
  • US11789483B2 patent drawing
  • US11789483B2 patent drawing
  • US11789483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various implementations include an assistive driving device including a base, a first post, a second post, a third post, and a selector. The first post is for receiving a portion of a palm of a hand of a user and has a proximal end and a distal end. The second post has a proximal end and a distal end. The third post has a proximal end and a distal end. The proximal ends of the first, second, and third posts are coupled to the base. The second post and the third post are positioned to receive a portion of an arm of the user. The selector is spaced apart from the first post and positioned such that the selector is actuatable with a dorsum of the hand of the user.