Automated Identity-Proofing Using Associate Video Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current identity-proofing methods in computer systems are inadequate due to vulnerabilities in username and password combinations, SMS OTPs, hardware tokens, and biometrics, leading to security breaches and inefficiencies, particularly in verifying user identities and resolving security alerts without manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

An automated process that uses a smartphone to collect and verify video or biometric data, confirms identity through a list of associates, derives a biometric, and saves it for future authentication, allowing for automatic resolution of security alerts and improved user authentication efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional username and password authentication is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability of security is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication process is segmented into multiple independent verification stages: initial username/password verification, biometric data collection, associate confirmation requests, and final identity proofing. Each stage operates independently to verify different aspects of identity, preventing single-point failures and reducing reliance on any single authentication method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Associates serve as intermediaries who receive biometric data, analyze it, and provide confirmation or disavowal of the user's identity. This intermediary layer adds an independent verification step that neither the user nor the system administrator directly controls, enhancing reliability through distributed trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If SMS OTP or hardware tokens are used for identity verification, then reliability of security is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically manages the entire identity proofing workflow without requiring administrator intervention. Associates receive automated requests, analyze biometric data independently, and provide confirmations automatically. The system tracks all interactions and finalizes identity verification autonomously, eliminating the need for manual security alert resolution while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If biometric data is collected and analyzed by associates, then reliability of identity proofing is improved, but loss of time is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Biometric data is collected and prepared in advance before being sent to associates for analysis. The system proactively initiates the identity proofing process, gathers necessary biometric information, and pre-configures associate notifications. This preliminary preparation reduces waiting time during the actual verification stage by having all data ready for immediate associate review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The identity proofing process operates continuously without interruption. While associates analyze biometric data, the system simultaneously tracks confirmations, manages timing thresholds, and prepares subsequent authentication steps. Multiple operations proceed in parallel, ensuring that no time is wasted between verification stages and maintaining continuous productive action throughout the verification workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If automated identity proofing with associate confirmation is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs multiple functions through a single integrated platform: collecting biometric data, managing associate networks, sending and tracking confirmation requests, analyzing responses, and finalizing identity proofing. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into one unified solution, improving productivity without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10855679B2Automated scalable identity-proofing and authentication process
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 VERCRIO INC
  • US10855679B2 patent drawing
  • US10855679B2 patent drawing
  • US10855679B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated process is disclosed for improving the functionality of computer systems and electronic commerce in user identity-proofing. Steps include verifying that a user who is electronically seeking identity proofing is on an electronic directory of persons eligible for such identity proofing; creating an attest list for the user that includes associates who can vouch for his or her identity; collecting a video or other data from the user; sending the video or data to the associates and asking them for a confirmation or a disavowal of the identity of the user; deriving a biometric from the video or data upon receiving the confirmation; and saving the biometric as an identity-proofed biometric.