Assortment Planning Data Management for Retail Negotiations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for assortment planning and vendor negotiation lack efficient data management, leading to version control issues and disparate tools being used, which complicates the process and results in outdated data being used for decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A common item data management system that stores item records and allows for real-time sharing and updating of attribute information across various tools, ensuring a single source of truth for item data and managing access rights to maintain data integrity during the negotiation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If disparate tools and spreadsheets are used for vendor-retailer negotiations, then each party can maintain control over their own data and processes, but version control issues arise and data becomes outdated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in negotiation processesVSAvoidversion control of item attributes
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple disparate negotiation tools and spreadsheets into a single centralized negotiation platform. This consolidation allows all parties (retailers and vendors) to access and update item attributes in a unified system, eliminating version control issues while maintaining the flexibility needed for negotiations. The system enables real-time collaboration without requiring parties to switch between multiple tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a centralized negotiation platform as an intermediary between retailers and vendors. This intermediary system manages data exchange, version control, and attribute updates centrally, allowing both parties to maintain control over their own data while ensuring everyone accesses the same current information. The platform mediates the negotiation process without requiring parties to use disparate tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If multiple computing systems access and modify item records independently, then each system can operate autonomously, but data consistency and integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous system operationVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a centralized data repository where all computing systems access item records from the same location, ensuring data consistency. By establishing a common data platform, the system eliminates the potential for divergent data versions while still allowing autonomous systems to operate. All parties work from the same data baseline, maintaining reliability without sacrificing operational independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

3Reliability

If a centralized system stores all item attributes, then data consistency is maintained, but access control and security become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidpermission management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements differentiated access rights where different user roles (retailers, vendors, administrators) have specific permissions tailored to their needs. The system applies local quality by granting read-only access to some attributes for certain users while allowing edit access to others. This granular permission structure maintains data consistency through centralized storage while managing complexity through role-based access control that adapts to different user requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of information

If real-time data sharing is implemented across all negotiation tools, then all stakeholders have access to latest information, but system complexity and integration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeliness of item dataVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal negotiation platform that serves multiple functions: storing item attributes, managing negotiations, controlling access rights, and enabling real-time data sharing. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional system, the patent achieves real-time data availability without the complexity of integrating multiple separate systems. The platform handles all negotiation-related operations within one unified environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12190289B2Assortment planning data management
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 TARGET BRANDS INC
  • US12190289B2 patent drawing
  • US12190289B2 patent drawing
  • US12190289B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A software system operates to store information about a plurality of products in a common data management system that serves as a single source of truth for product information. Multiple different computing systems can access and edit item records. As information in the item records is updated, other computing systems can access the updated information immediately. The overall system is a multi-use tool for assortment planning that allows for flexible data sharing across the lifecycle of an item for item definition, budget definition, and vendor negotiation.