Assortment Planning System Simulating Product Interactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers face difficulties in determining how the addition or deletion of products affects overall and individual product performance metrics such as sales volume and profits due to complex interactions within product assortments.

Innovation Solution

An assortment planning system that simulates the impact of adding or deleting products by using a graphical user interface, interaction unit, and transfer demand engine to calculate and represent the effects on sales volume and profits, allowing retailers to optimize their product offerings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If retailers expand their product assortment to meet customer preferences, then customer satisfaction and sales volume increase, but difficulty in determining performance metric impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales volumeVSAvoidperformance metric impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the overall performance metric into individual product-level metrics. It calculates and displays performance metrics for each product separately, allowing retailers to understand the specific impact of each product on overall sales volume and profits, rather than dealing with aggregated data alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary simulation engine that models the complex interactions between products. This simulation technology acts as a mediator between the retailer's assortment decisions and the actual performance outcomes, providing predictive insights into how product additions or deletions will affect overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If retailers delete unpopular products to optimize assortment, then profits may improve, but uncertainty about overall performance impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprofitsVSAvoidperformance metric information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and analysis before retailers make deletion decisions. It predicts the potential impact of removing unpopular products on overall profits and sales volume, allowing retailers to make informed decisions about which products to delete based on simulated outcomes rather than intuition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback loops that show the relationship between product deletions and performance metric changes. It displays how deleting specific products will affect individual product metrics and overall assortment performance, enabling retailers to adjust their decisions based on this feedback information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If retailers analyze individual product performance to optimize assortment, then product-level insights improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct-level performance measurementVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides a universal platform that handles multiple functions: it calculates individual product metrics, simulates product interactions, predicts performance outcomes, and generates actionable insights. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate analysis tools into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically calculates and updates performance metrics for individual products based on simulation results. It self-generates the detailed product-level insights without requiring manual analysis, reducing the complexity burden on retailers while providing precise measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8527321B2Product assortment planning system
Publication Date: 2013.09.03 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US8527321B2 patent drawing
  • US8527321B2 patent drawing
  • US8527321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The system includes a comparison unit that identifies products in an initial assortment of products, a desired assortment of products and the performance metric for each product. The comparison unit compares the initial assortment of products and the desired assortment of products to determine kept products, added product and deleted products. The system includes an interaction unit simulating the interaction of the kept products, the added products and the deleted products based on the performance metric. The system generates simulation results identifying the interactions between the kept products, the added products and the deleted products.