Asymmetric Casing Centralizer for Horizontal Wellbore Cement Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In oil and gas exploration, casing centralizers often settle at the bottom of horizontal wellbores, causing a maldistribution of cement flow due to uneven pressure drops, which leads to inefficient cement distribution and potential choking of cement flow at the bottom of the wellbore.

Innovation Solution

A casing centralizer design featuring spiral and straight vanes with varying radial heights and orientations that self-aligns during insertion, creating a pressure gradient that counteracts gravity and ensures even cement distribution by positioning straight vanes at the bottom and spiral vanes at the top, reducing pressure drop at the bottom of the wellbore.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional casing centralizer is used in horizontal wellbore sections, then the casing is centralized within the wellbore, but the centralizer settles on the bottom of the horizontal wellbore wall creating uneven pressure drops that choke cement flow at the bottom

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecement flow distributionVSAvoidcement flowability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The centralizer employs asymmetric flow resistance design where the first flow resistance at the bottom of the centralizer is less than the second flow resistance at the top. This asymmetry compensates for the gravitational settling of the centralizer on the bottom of the horizontal wellbore, creating a pressure gradient that promotes uniform cement flow distribution throughout the annular region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Different circumferential sections of the centralizer are designed with different flow resistance characteristics. The bottom section (first circumferential location) has lower flow resistance while the top section (second circumferential location) has higher flow resistance, allowing each section to perform its specific function in counteracting gravitational effects and distributing cement flow evenly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If the centralizer settles on the bottom of the horizontal wellbore, then gravitational force is overcome, but a pressure drop gradient is created that chokes cement flow at the bottom

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegravitational forceVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The centralizer is designed with predetermined asymmetric flow resistance characteristics that counteract the gravitational settling effect before it can cause harmful cement flow maldistribution. The lower flow resistance at the bottom section is pre-configured to compensate for the expected gravitational settling, creating a pressure gradient that prevents choking of cement flow at the bottom of the wellbore.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Stability of the object's composition

If the centralizer creates high flow resistance at the bottom to prevent settling, then gravitational settling is reduced, but cement flow is choked at the bottom creating maldistribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralizer positionVSAvoidcement flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralizer employs asymmetric flow resistance design where the first flow resistance at the bottom is intentionally made less than the second flow resistance at the top. This asymmetric configuration allows the centralizer to maintain its position while simultaneously preventing choking of cement flow, as the lower bottom flow resistance compensates for gravitational settling effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The self-aligning mechanism ensures a more uniform cement distribution across the annular region, reducing maldistribution and preventing cement flow choking, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of cement placement in horizontal wellbores.

Implementation Method 1

creating a pressure gradient that counteracts gravity and ensures even cement distribution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

pressure gradient that counteracts gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 3

first flow resistance that is less than a second flow resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow resistance: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS10378293B2Asymmetric casing centralizer
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 TOP CO INC
  • US10378293B2 patent drawing
  • US10378293B2 patent drawing
  • US10378293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Asymmetric casing centralizers are provided with varying flow resistances caused by a combination of straight vanes and spiral vanes; as a result, the casing centralizer has varying pressure drops thereacross when the casing centralizer is positioned within a preexisting structure such as, for example, a horizontal wellbore section that traverses one or more subterranean formations.