Asymmetric Chain Ring Teeth for Secure Chain Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional chain rings with uniform teeth can lead to gaps that increase the risk of chain disengagement and may result in increased weight, entanglement of debris, and damage due to larger teeth sizes, which are undesirable for vehicle performance and safety.

Innovation Solution

A chain ring design featuring teeth with identical thickness at their thickest point, with alternating rectangular and non-rectangular cross-sectional shapes to fit within inner and outer links of a drive chain, applying lateral pressure in specific directions and offsetting top surfaces asymmetrically to improve interfitting and reduce entanglement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If teeth of larger size are used to reduce gaps and improve chain engagement, then chain disengagement risk is reduced, but weight of the chain ring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechain engagement reliabilityVSAvoidchain ring weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different tooth configurations to different subsets of teeth around the chain ring. First subset teeth have a first cross-sectional shape optimized for engaging inner links, while second subset teeth have a second cross-sectional shape optimized for engaging outer links. This local differentiation allows each tooth to be precisely sized for its specific engagement task, reducing overall weight while maintaining reliable chain engagement without requiring all teeth to be uniformly large.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If teeth of larger size are used to reduce gaps and improve chain engagement, then chain disengagement risk is reduced, but risk of tooth catching on chain portions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechain engagement reliabilityVSAvoidtooth catching damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different subsets of teeth have different cross-sectional shapes tailored to their specific engagement requirements. This local optimization ensures that each tooth's size and shape are precisely matched to the chain link it engages, preventing excessive size that would cause catching while maintaining sufficient engagement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If teeth of larger size are used to reduce gaps and improve chain engagement, then chain disengagement risk is reduced, but likelihood of debris entanglement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechain engagement reliabilityVSAvoiddebris entanglement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs different cross-sectional shapes for different tooth subsets, allowing precise optimization of each tooth's dimensions. This prevents unnecessary material accumulation between teeth that would occur with uniformly large teeth, thereby reducing debris entanglement while maintaining reliable chain engagement through locally optimized tooth geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If uniform teeth are used in chain ring, then manufacturing is simplified, but gaps between tooth and chain increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidchain engagement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent differentiates teeth into subsets with different cross-sectional shapes, where first subset teeth are optimized for inner link engagement and second subset teeth for outer link engagement. This local differentiation eliminates gaps between teeth and chain links by tailoring each tooth's geometry to its specific engagement target, while the systematic subset approach keeps manufacturing complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The chain ring teeth are segmented into distinct subsets with different configurations. This segmentation allows each subset to be independently optimized for its specific function (engaging inner vs. outer links), resolving the gap issue without requiring complete redesign of all teeth, thus balancing manufacturing feasibility with engagement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Reliability

If alternating narrow and wide teeth are used to match chain link widths, then chain engagement is improved, but weight of the chain ring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechain engagement reliabilityVSAvoidchain ring weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different cross-sectional shapes to different tooth subsets rather than alternating narrow and wide teeth throughout. This allows precise local optimization where each tooth subset is sized appropriately for its specific engagement task, avoiding the weight penalty of uniformly larger alternating teeth while maintaining reliable engagement with both inner and outer links.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12098761B2Chain ring with teeth oppositely laterally engaging a drive chain
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 EKO SPORT INC
  • US12098761B2 patent drawing
  • US12098761B2 patent drawing
  • US12098761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive system for a vehicle includes a chain ring and a drive chain. The chain ring has a plurality of teeth serially arranged and joined to one another. A first subset of teeth has a first outer face that applies a lateral pressure to a link of a drive chain in a first direction. A second subset of teeth has a second outer face that applies a lateral pressure to another link of a drive chain in a second direction. The teeth all have substantially the same width. The top surfaces of the teeth are offset from the centerline of the drive chain. The centerlines of the top surfaces of the teeth are arranged asymmetrically on one side of the centerline of the drive chain.