Asymmetric Composite Laminates for Tapering and Crack Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional composite laminated structures are constrained by symmetry and balance requirements, leading to inefficiencies such as excessive material usage, complexity in tapering, and micro-cracking, which limits their suitability for applications requiring minimal stress differential between first and last ply failure.

Innovation Solution

The development of asymmetric and unbalanced laminated structures using sub-laminate modules with acute angles less than 90°, allowing for non-crimped configurations and reduced ply orientations, which facilitates easier manufacturing and improved homogenization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If symmetric and balanced laminate structures are used, then structural stability and resistance to warping are improved, but material usage increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using unbalanced laminate structures with non-mirror-image ply orientations. Specifically, the laminate includes plies with different orientations (e.g., 0°, ±45°, 90°) that are not symmetrically arranged about the mid-plane, eliminating the need for excessive material while maintaining structural integrity through optimized fiber distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If symmetric and balanced laminate structures are used, then structural stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates symmetry requirements by designing unbalanced laminates where plies are arranged according to performance needs rather than mirror-image constraints. This reduces manufacturing complexity by removing the need for precise symmetric stacking sequences while maintaining structural stability through optimized ply orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying ply orientations and thicknesses at different locations within the laminate to optimize local stress distribution and structural performance. This allows tailored fiber reinforcement in high-stress areas without requiring symmetric arrangements throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional laminate structures are used, then manufacturing process is standardized, but micro-cracking occurs reducing reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing standardizationVSAvoidmicro-cracking resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the structural parameters by using unbalanced ply orientations and non-traditional stacking sequences. This alters the stress distribution pattern within the laminate, reducing stress concentrations that lead to micro-cracking while maintaining manufacturability through adapted curing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If symmetric laminate structures are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but tapering capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidtapering capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables tapering by using asymmetric laminate structures where plies can be selectively dropped or varied in thickness at different locations without compromising overall structural integrity. The unbalanced design allows gradual transitions in cross-section while maintaining optimized fiber reinforcement patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying ply orientations and thicknesses at different locations within the laminate to optimize local stress distribution and structural performance. This allows tailored fiber reinforcement in high-stress areas without requiring symmetric arrangements throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20120177872A1Composite laminated structures and methods for manufacturing and using the same
Publication Date: 2012.07.12 THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV
  • US20120177872A1 patent drawing
  • US20120177872A1 patent drawing
  • US20120177872A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Variously configured sub-laminate modules are provided, which comprise at least a first ply and a second ply, the first ply comprising fibers extending in a first orientation, the second ply comprising fibers extending in a second orientation. The second orientation is offset relative to the first orientation, which offset defines an acute angle between the two orientations. The acute angle is less than 90 degrees and in at least one embodiment, the acute angle is approximately 25°. In certain embodiments, the acute angle further defines an unbalanced structure of the sub-laminate module. In certain embodiments, the first and second plies may be further secured relative to one another in a non-crimped configuration. Composite laminated structures formed from various embodiments of the sub-laminate modules are also provided, at least some of which may be homogenized. Various methods of manufacturing the sub-laminate modules and the composite laminated structures are also provided.