Asymmetric Composite Drive Shaft for Unidirectional Torque Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional composite drive shafts with symmetrical layups are prone to failures due to uneven loading under torsional stresses, as they are heavily loaded in one stress path and under-loaded in another, leading to potential failures along compressive or tensile load paths.

Innovation Solution

An asymmetrically-structured composite drive shaft design is implemented, with more fiber-reinforced layers oriented in the compressive stress direction than in the tensile stress direction, enhancing torque-carrying capability in one torsional direction over the opposite direction by unifying the risks of structural failures under both compressive and tensile stresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a symmetrical layup is used in composite drive shafts, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but the shaft is prone to failures under dominant unidirectional torque because it is heavily loaded in one stress path and under-loaded in another

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using an asymmetric layup configuration where the number of layers in the first direction exceeds the number of layers in the second direction. Specifically, the composite shaft has more layers oriented to resist compressive stresses than tensile stresses, matching the dominant unidirectional torque loading conditions. This asymmetric distribution of layers optimizes the shaft's torque-carrying capability in the dominant direction while preventing failure, directly resolving the reliability issue with symmetrical layups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If more layers are added to handle compressive stresses, then the torque-carrying capability in the dominant direction is improved, but the weight of the shaft increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque-carrying capabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the number of layers in different directions based on the specific loading conditions. Instead of uniformly distributing layers in all directions (which would increase weight unnecessarily), the asymmetric layup concentrates more layers specifically in the direction that resists compressive stresses from dominant unidirectional torque. This localized optimization provides the necessary strength where needed while minimizing weight in other directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of layer distribution from symmetric to asymmetric, specifically adjusting the number of layers in the first direction to exceed the number in the second direction. This parameter change optimizes the strength-to-weight ratio by tailoring the composite structure to the dominant loading conditions, achieving maximum torque-carrying capability with minimum necessary material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If an asymmetric layup is used to optimize torque-carrying capability, then the reliability under dominant torque is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements asymmetry in the layup configuration where the first plurality of layers exceeds the second plurality of layers in number. This asymmetric design directly addresses the dominant unidirectional torque loading by providing enhanced compressive stress resistance. The structural complexity increase is minimal and focused only on the layer distribution, while reliability is significantly improved through optimized stress path management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The asymmetric design increases the efficiency and torque-bearing ability of the composite drive shaft while reducing weight, by optimizing fiber distribution based on material strengths to handle dominant unidirectional torsional loads effectively.

Implementation Method 1

The first plurality of layers and the second plurality of layers are impregnated with a polymer matrix

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpregnation: Absorption (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11773896B2Composite drive shaft under dominant unidirectional torque
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US11773896B2 patent drawing
  • US11773896B2 patent drawing
  • US11773896B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drive shaft extending along a central axis is configured to operate under dominant unidirectional torsional load. The drive shaft has an asymmetrically-structured composite body which is configured to have a greater torque-carrying capability in a first torsional direction than in a second torsional direction that is opposite the first torsional direction.