Asymmetric Gradient Coil Calibration for MRI Concomitant Field Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-performance MRI systems with asymmetric gradient coils face challenges in accurately calibrating concomitant gradient field corrections, leading to image artifacts and reduced image quality due to non-linear spatial variations in magnetic fields.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to determine phase difference measurements using bipolar gradient waveforms applied to gradient coils, allowing for the calculation of gradient coil constants and the generation of compensatory waveforms to correct concomitant gradient fields, which are then applied to compensate for these effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high gradient amplitude coils are used to achieve higher image quality and spatial resolution, then image quality and spatial resolution are improved, but non-linearity in the gradient field strength increases and becomes more severe farther from isocenter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidgradient field linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration measurements to determine actual gradient coil constants before imaging. Compensatory gradient waveforms are pre-calculated based on these measured constants to counteract the non-linear effects before the actual imaging sequence is executed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the gradient waveform parameters by applying compensatory gradients that are calculated based on the measured coil constants. This modifies the effective gradient field to correct for non-linearities while maintaining the desired imaging gradient strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If asymmetric gradient coils are used to achieve compact design and high gradient amplitude, then device size is reduced and gradient amplitude is improved, but accurate calibration of gradient coil parameters becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegradient amplitudeVSAvoidcalibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by using the asymmetric gradient coils themselves to generate measurable phase differences in a phantom. The calibration process uses the coils' own operational characteristics to determine their specific constants, eliminating the need for external calibration equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical calibration methods with an electromagnetic field-based measurement approach. Instead of using physical measurement tools, the system uses MRI signal phase differences generated by the gradient coils themselves to determine calibration constants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If conventional gradient coil calibration methods are used, then calibration process is simple, but image artifacts occur and image quality is reduced due to uncorrected concomitant gradient fields

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration simplicityVSAvoidimage artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where calibration measurements are taken to determine actual coil constants, which then inform the calculation of compensatory waveforms. This measured-feedback approach ensures that the correction parameters accurately reflect the actual coil performance, eliminating artifacts while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves image quality by accurately correcting concomitant gradient field errors, ensuring precise calibration of asymmetric gradient coils and reducing artifacts, even with high-amplitude gradient fields, and is applicable across a range of gradient amplitudes.

Implementation Method 1

Gradient coils in the MRI system produce gradients which distorts this uniform magnetic field. In general, the gradients cause the change in field strength of the magnetic field in the patient body from one point to another.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

determining a plurality of first phase difference measurements between two acquisitions using a plurality of first bipolar gradient waveforms applied to a first gradient coil axis or direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

A first gradient coil axis' constant is determined based on the plurality of first phase different measurements. With the determined first gradient coil (axis) constant, compensatory gradient waveforms related to that gradient coil axis are determined.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic Field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 4

the compensatory gradient waveforms are applied along with target gradient waveforms to compensate for a concomitant gradient field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS11294016B1System and method for calibration of asymmetric gradient concomitant field correction parameters
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US11294016B1 patent drawing
  • US11294016B1 patent drawing
  • US11294016B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for correcting concomitant gradient field effects in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system includes determining a plurality of first phase difference measurements between two acquisitions using a plurality of first bipolar gradient waveforms applied to a first gradient coil. A first gradient coil constant is determined based on the plurality of first phase difference measurements and compensatory gradient waveforms are determined based on the first gradient coil constant. The compensatory gradient waveforms are applied to the gradient coils along with target gradient waveforms to compensate for a concomitant gradient field.