Asymmetric Grid Holding Element for Direct Tolerance Mounting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grid-holding elements are limited in their ability to be mounted directly using a hand-held setting tool and require auxiliary means to secure a grid to a support or constructional component.

Innovation Solution

A grid-holding element with a saddle-shaped attachment section and angled surface sections that act as a springy hinge, providing a tolerance range for secure mounting without auxiliary elements, allowing for adjustable height and preventing the hook-shaped end from slipping off during securing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional grid-holding element with symmetric foot sections is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but it cannot provide adequate height tolerance and requires auxiliary mounting means

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting easeVSAvoidattachment section complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment section features asymmetric foot sections where the first foot section has a maximal extension length greater than the second foot section in the perpendicular direction. This asymmetry creates a tolerance range that accommodates height variations in the support structure, enabling direct mounting without auxiliary means while maintaining structural simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a height dimension difference between the two foot sections of the attachment section. By varying the extension length in the perpendicular direction, the patent creates a three-dimensional tolerance zone that allows the holding element to adapt to height variations in the support, eliminating the need for auxiliary mounting components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the holding element height is fixed with precise tolerance, then mounting precision is improved, but the element cannot adapt to height variations in support structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight tolerance adaptabilityVSAvoidholding element height precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric design of the foot sections with different maximal extension lengths creates an inherent tolerance range. The first foot section extends further than the second foot section in the perpendicular direction, providing a built-in adjustment range that adapts to support height variations without requiring high manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the attachment section by making the foot sections asymmetric. Specifically, the maximal extension length of the first foot section is designed to be greater than that of the second foot section, creating a parameter-based tolerance mechanism that provides adaptability while relaxing manufacturing precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If auxiliary mounting means are used to secure the grid, then mounting reliability is improved, but the device complexity and number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the mounting function directly into the holding element itself through the asymmetric attachment section. The foot sections with different extension lengths integrate the tolerance compensation and mounting functions into a single component, eliminating the need for separate auxiliary mounting means while maintaining reliable attachment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment section is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides structural support, accommodates height variations through asymmetric foot sections, and enables direct mounting with setting tools. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for additional auxiliary components, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining mounting reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables easy and secure mounting of the grid-holding element using a setting tool, eliminating the need for auxiliary means and ensuring stability across a tolerance range, enhancing the holding element's height adjustment capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

The first leg has a first surface section and at least one second surface section forming an angle with the first surface section, a bending axis between the two surface sections extends transverse to a longitudinal extent of the first leg. The angle between the surface sections can be acute or obtuse. As a result, both surface section act as a springy hinge, with surface sections pulling away form each other under a heavy load.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS7789365B2Grid-holding element
Publication Date: 2010.09.07 HILTI AG
  • US7789365B2 patent drawing
  • US7789365B2 patent drawing
  • US7789365B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A grid holding element has a first leg (11) at least one free end of which is hook-shaped, and a second leg (12) having a saddle-shaped attachment section (20) in which a through-opening (23) through which a fastening element (30) is extendable, is formed, a first foot section (2) that projects from the attachment section in a direction away from the first leg (11), and a second foot section (22) adjoining the first leg (11), with a maximal extension length (D1) of the first foot section (21) in a direction perpendicular to a plane (E) defined by the attachment section (20), being greater than a maximal extension length (D2) of the second foot section (22) in the direction perpendicular to the plane (E).