Asymmetric Integral Lifting with Dragging Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in modern architectural construction is the difficulty in lifting integral structures with eccentric centroid of lifting points from the gravity center, leading to high-altitude work risks, unsteady construction quality, and prolonged site periods due to irregular and asymmetrical supporting points.

Innovation Solution

A method for asymmetric integral construction lifting that involves determining optimal lifting points, using a dragging device to stabilize the structure, and employing a lifting system with sensors to ensure stability and safety, allowing for pre-welding on the ground and minimizing high-altitude work.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If high-altitude piecemeal assemble method is used, then the construction can be completed with irregular and asymmetrical supporting points, but the safety risk increases and construction quality becomes unsteady

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to irregular supporting pointsVSAvoidconstruction safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The construction is divided into multiple segments that can be assembled piecemeal at high altitude, allowing the structure to adapt to irregular and asymmetrical supporting points while maintaining safety through controlled segmentation of the assembly process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The construction method employs dynamic adjustment capabilities during high-altitude assembly, allowing workers to adapt to varying supporting point positions and maintain stability throughout the piecemeal assembly process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If high-altitude piecemeal assemble method is used, then the construction can accommodate asymmetrical structures, but the construction quality becomes unsteady due to bad welding conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to asymmetrical structuresVSAvoidwelding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is segmented into components that can be pre-assembled and welded under controlled conditions, then lifted and positioned at the final location, ensuring high welding quality while maintaining adaptability to asymmetrical configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Critical welding and assembly operations are performed preliminarily on the ground under controlled conditions before final installation, ensuring high manufacturing precision while maintaining the ability to accommodate asymmetrical structures at the installation site

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If high-altitude piecemeal assemble method is used, then the construction can be completed with irregular supporting points, but the working period on site is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to irregular supporting pointsVSAvoidworking period on site
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Extensive assembly, welding, and preparation work is performed preliminarily on the ground under controlled conditions, reducing the duration and complexity of high-altitude work and thereby shortening the overall working period on site while maintaining adaptability to irregular supporting points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The construction process is organized to maintain continuous useful action through careful planning of lifting sequences and assembly operations, minimizing idle time and ensuring that each phase flows smoothly into the next, thereby reducing the overall working period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Ease of manufacture

If integral lifting method is used with eccentric lifting points, then the construction can be lifted as a whole, but the centroid of lifting points becomes greatly eccentric from the gravity center

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of integral liftingVSAvoidlifting stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting system is designed to accommodate and compensate for the asymmetry between the centroid of lifting points and the gravity center of the construction, using asymmetric counterweights or adjustable lifting mechanisms to restore balance during the lifting process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

Counterweight mechanisms are employed to compensate for the eccentricity between lifting points and gravity center, creating balancing forces that restore stability during integral lifting of the construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces high-altitude risks, ensures construction quality, and shortens site working periods by stabilizing the lifting process and allowing for pre-welding, thus providing a safer and more efficient lifting solution for asymmetric integral construction.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic pump source system disposed on the lifting frame, a hydraulic lifting machine connected with the hydraulic pump source system via a hydraulic oil line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic press: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

sensors which are disposed on the hydraulic lifting machine, to monitor the lifting synchronism of all lifting points during the integral construction lifting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSensor detection:

Implementation Method 3

arranging a dragging device between the dragging point and the ground projection point, so as to ensure the stability during asymmetric construction lifting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8745956B2Asymmetric integral lifting construction method
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 GUANGZHOU CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CO LTD
  • US8745956B2 patent drawing
  • US8745956B2 patent drawing
  • US8745956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for lifting an asymmetric integral construction is provided, including the steps of determining proper lifting points on a construction to be lifted according to the position relationship between the construction and a base supporter, setting a dragging point on the bottom of the construction, the dragging point being located on the extension line of the connection between the gravity center of construction and the centroid of the lifting points, determining a projection point of the dragging point on the ground, arranging a dragging device between the dragging point and the projection point, installing a lifting system at a proper position, conducting lifting operation by means of the lifting system cooperated with the dragging device, and rectifying and fixing the construction after it is in place.