Asymmetric Reflector Cup for LED Light Direction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional large format LED displays waste a significant amount of light due to their elevated mounting, leading to inefficiency and light pollution, as much of the emitted light is not visible to viewers and causes unwanted reflections and glare.

Innovation Solution

The use of LED packages with a reflector cup having a bottom surface and a wall surface inclined relative to the bottom surface, which directs light emission towards the viewer's line of sight, reducing waste and pollution by optimizing the light distribution and reducing the need for complex mounting hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If LED displays are mounted at elevated positions, then visibility coverage area is improved, but light waste and light pollution increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility coverage areaVSAvoidlight waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reflector cup employs an asymmetric geometry with a non-uniform cross-section along its height. The cross-sectional area varies continuously from the base to the apex, creating different reflection angles for light rays depending on their origin point. This asymmetric structure directs light preferentially toward lower viewing angles, matching the typical viewer position while minimizing upward light waste, thus resolving the contradiction between coverage area and energy loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The reflector cup's cross-sectional area is locally optimized at different heights. The upper portion has a smaller cross-sectional area compared to the base, creating a tapered structure. This local variation in geometry allows the reflector to concentrate and redirect light toward specific viewing zones (lower angles) while reducing light emission in unwanted directions (upward and horizontal), thereby decreasing light waste without compromising visibility coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If display mounting angle is adjusted to match viewer's line of sight, then light efficiency is improved, but mounting hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight efficiencyVSAvoidmounting hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the light direction control function from the mounting hardware and integrates it directly into the LED package structure through the reflector cup. Instead of requiring complex angled mounting brackets or adjustable mechanisms, the reflector cup's asymmetric geometry inherently directs light at the desired angles. This extraction of the directional control function from the mounting system simplifies the overall hardware complexity while maintaining high light efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The reflector cup serves multiple functions simultaneously: it reflects and redirects light, defines the beam pattern, and provides structural support for the LED chip. By integrating these functions into a single component within the LED package, the design eliminates the need for separate mounting hardware to achieve proper light direction, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining optimal light efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the efficiency of light emission from LED displays, reduces energy consumption, and minimizes light pollution by directing light towards the viewer, thereby improving the overall performance and visibility of large format LED displays.

Implementation Method 1

reflector cup having a bottom surface and a wall surface inclined relative to the bottom surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8487326B2LED device having a tilted peak emission and an LED display including such devices
Publication Date: 2013.07.16 CREELED INC
  • US8487326B2 patent drawing
  • US8487326B2 patent drawing
  • US8487326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An LED package and a lead frame include a reflector cup having a bottom surface with an LED asymmetrically positioned on the bottom surface and a wall surface inclined relative to the bottom surface and defining an opening at an upper end thereof. The bottom surface of the reflector cup has a first axial dimension along a first axis and a second axial dimension along a second axis, orthogonal to the first axis. A display having an asymmetrical FFP and asymmetrical screen curve includes an array of the LED modules including a plurality of LED packages. At least some of the LED packages include a dome-shaped lens asymmetrically positioned with respect to a geometric center of the bottom surface of the reflector cup.