Asymmetric Rolling Apparatus for Magnesium Formability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rolling techniques fail to effectively improve the formability of metals like magnesium at room temperature due to poor development of the slip system, resulting in limited deformation capabilities and surface roughness.

Innovation Solution

An asymmetric rolling method is employed, where a to-be-rolled material is processed using rolls with different diameters and controlled rotary angular speeds to apply asymmetric shear stresses, ensuring identical rotary linear velocities while maintaining diameter ratios, thereby optimizing the texture and formability of the rolled material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional rolling techniques are used to process metal at room temperature, then the rolling process is simple and straightforward, but the formability of the metal remains poor due to inadequate slip system development

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveformabilityVSAvoidrolling apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using rolling rolls with different diameters (first roll with diameter D1, second roll with diameter D2 where D1≠D2) to create asymmetric shear stress distribution during rolling. This asymmetric configuration generates different shear stresses on the upper and lower surfaces of the metal, which effectively develops the slip system and improves formability at room temperature without requiring complex heating or multi-stage processing equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Strength

If asymmetric rolling with different diameter rolls is employed to improve formability, then the slip system is well developed and formability improves, but the apparatus complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveformabilityVSAvoidrolling apparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameter of the rolling apparatus by using rolls with different diameters (D1 and D2) and controls the rotary angular speeds (ω1 and ω2) to maintain identical linear velocities at the roll surfaces. This parameter change creates asymmetric shear stress distribution that develops the slip system effectively, improving formability while keeping the apparatus relatively simple through controlled parameter variation rather than complex mechanism design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional rolling is used to reduce surface roughness, then the process is straightforward, but surface roughness and warping remain significant problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface roughnessVSAvoidrolling process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses asymmetric rolling with rolls of different diameters to create asymmetric shear stress distribution during the rolling process. This asymmetric stress state effectively reduces surface roughness and warping by promoting uniform plastic deformation and slip system development across the metal surface, achieving better surface quality without requiring additional surface treatment equipment or complex multi-pass rolling configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the formability of metals by configuring the basal plane slip system to facilitate easier deformation at room temperature, reducing surface roughness and warping, and improving the overall material properties of the rolled product.

Implementation Method 1

different shear stresses are applied to the first and second surfaces of the to-be-rolled material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Implementation Method 2

a micro structure of a to-be-rolled material is changed according to a volumetric change of the to-be-rolled material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9126248B2Asymmetric rolling apparatus, asymmetric rolling method and rolled materials fabricated by using the same
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 SOLUM ADVANCED MATERIALS CO LTD
  • US9126248B2 patent drawing
  • US9126248B2 patent drawing
  • US9126248B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an asymmetric rolling method including: entering a to-be-rolled material having a first surface and a second surface between a first roll and a second roll that has a greater diameter than that of the first roll and a rotary angular speed that is different from that of the first roll while the first surface and the second surface respectively contact the first roll and the second roll, followed by rolling, and entering the rolled to-be-rolled material between a third roll and a fourth roll that has a greater diameter than that of the third roll and a rotary angular speed that is different from that of the third roll while the first surface and the second surface respectively contact the fourth roll and the third roll, followed by rolling, wherein different shear stresses are applied to the first and second surfaces of the to-be-rolled material.