Asymmetric Screening Deck for Crushed Stone Fractionation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Screening decks in the mining and stone industries face wear issues and inefficiencies due to the abrasive nature of crushed stones, particularly when vibrated, and the challenge of ensuring that material travels in a way that maximizes passage through screening holes, minimizing oversize fractions and wear patterns.

Innovation Solution

The use of non-parallel sides on screening elements and varying heights of screening elements, combined with different types of elements arranged to create narrowing passages and winding paths, along with snap locks for secure fastening, to alter the material's travel direction and increase the likelihood of passage through holes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If crushed stone is vibrated to flow slowly over the screen, then fractionation efficiency is improved, but wear on screening elements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefractionation efficiencyVSAvoidwear on screening elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by providing screening elements with non-parallel sides where one side is longer than the other. This asymmetric geometry disrupts the longitudinal travel paths of crushed stone, preventing material from bypassing screening holes while maintaining controlled flow. The asymmetric shape creates varied material trajectories that increase interaction with screening holes, improving fractionation efficiency without requiring excessive vibration that would cause wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If rectangular screening elements with symmetric holes are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but material can travel over entire length without encountering holes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening element fabricationVSAvoidscreening effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms symmetric rectangular screening elements into asymmetric elements with non-parallel sides. This geometric modification ensures that no straight longitudinal path can traverse the entire screening element without intersecting screening holes. The asymmetric shape creates forced transverse movement of material, guaranteeing that particles encounter holes along their travel path, thereby maintaining reliable screening effectiveness while remaining manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces curved or angled sides to the screening elements rather than using straight parallel sides. This curvature modification disrupts linear material flow paths and forces particles to change direction, increasing the likelihood of interaction with screening holes. The curved geometry ensures that material cannot travel in a straight line across the entire element without encountering holes, improving screening reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple screening decks with ever smaller holes are stacked, then fractionation into finer sizes is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraction size controlVSAvoidscreening deck structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the screening function by providing multiple screening decks stacked vertically, each with different hole sizes. This segmentation allows fractionation of crushed stone into multiple size categories simultaneously. The upper decks have larger holes for coarser fractions while lower decks have smaller holes for finer fractions, achieving precise size control through systematic division of the screening function across multiple levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a vertical dimension to the screening arrangement by stacking multiple decks at different heights. Instead of using a single large screen, the system uses multiple screens arranged in the vertical dimension, allowing material to be fractionated into different size categories as it moves downward through the stacked decks. This dimensional arrangement achieves fine fractionation control while maintaining manageable individual deck designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces wear and enhances the fractionation process by ensuring that crushed stones or gravel travel in a manner that maximizes passage through screening holes, improving the separation efficiency and reducing the risk of material bypassing holes, thereby improving the overall screening effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

The vibration pattern and the inclination of the vibrating screen are arranged so that the crushed stones continuously flow in one direction on the screen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

Due to gravity, stones smaller than the screening holes in an upper deck will fall down to the neighboring lower deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS7637378B2Screening deck for fractionating crushed stone
Publication Date: 2009.12.29 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB
  • US7637378B2 patent drawing
  • US7637378B2 patent drawing
  • US7637378B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A screening deck for the screening of crushed stone material includes a plurality of screening elements arranged adjacent one another. At least one side of each screening element is non-parallel with respect to a longitudinal direction of the screening deck. The screening deck includes at least two different types of screening elements which are arranged at different heights in the screening deck for creating narrowing passages and/or winding paths and/or steps for the material traveling on the screening deck.